Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 9:47 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:45 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: When Trump gets his immigration courts that will be the end of this nonsense with the idiots in the 9th Circuit.
What nonsense, pray tell?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 9:50 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:47 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:45 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: When Trump gets his immigration courts that will be the end of this nonsense with the idiots in the 9th Circuit.
What nonsense, pray tell?
He likely means Trump getting his ass kicked
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 9:52 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:47 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:45 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: When Trump gets his immigration courts that will be the end of this nonsense with the idiots in the 9th Circuit.
What nonsense, pray tell?
Interjecting their personal political views into legal matters (immigration, national security involving foreign and domestic enemies) that the President clearly has the sole right to determine.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 9:58 pm
(This post was last modified: February 9, 2017 at 10:00 pm by SteelCurtain.)
(February 9, 2017 at 9:52 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:47 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: What nonsense, pray tell?
Interjecting their personal political views into legal matters (immigration, national security involving foreign and domestic enemies) that the President clearly has the sole right to determine.
So, if they had ruled that the immigration ban was legal, then that would not be their personal political views, right?
Why is it only 'personal political views' when multiple courts come to the same conclusion about the constitutionality of a presidential edict, and you don't like it? Isn't that exactly what the courts are there for?
Also, why aren't you rejoicing at the reigning in of executive authority? Isn't that the hallmark of conservatism, not giving one person too much power? Isn't that the biggest problem with Obama, that he expanded executive power so much?
Do you even know why the immigration ban was deemed unconstitutional? Or do you just know that it was judicial overreach to overturn the edict of a president?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 9:59 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:52 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Interjecting their personal political views into legal matters (immigration, national security involving foreign and domestic enemies) that the President clearly has the sole right to determine.
So, if they had ruled that the immigration ban was legal, then that would not be their personal political views, right?
Why is it only 'personal political views' when multiple courts come to the same conclusion about the constitutionality of a presidential edict? Isn't that exactly what the courts are there for?
Also, why aren't you rejoicing at the reigning in of executive authority? Isn't that the hallmark of conservatism, not giving one person too much power? Isn't that the biggest problem with Obama, that he expanded executive power so much?
Do you even know why the immigration ban was deemed unconstitutional? Or do you just know that it was judicial overreach to overturn the edict of a president?
Of course it's political
If a liberal does it 
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 6843
Threads: 0
Joined: February 22, 2014
Reputation:
15
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 10:04 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:58 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:52 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Interjecting their personal political views into legal matters (immigration, national security involving foreign and domestic enemies) that the President clearly has the sole right to determine.
So, if they had ruled that the immigration ban was legal, then that would not be their personal political views, right?
Why is it only 'personal political views' when multiple courts come to the same conclusion about the constitutionality of a presidential edict? Isn't that exactly what the courts are there for?
Also, why aren't you rejoicing at the reigning in of executive authority? Isn't that the hallmark of conservatism, not giving one person too much power? Isn't that the biggest problem with Obama, that he expanded executive power so much?
Do you even know why the immigration ban was deemed unconstitutional? Or do you just know that it was judicial overreach to overturn the edict of a president? It was judicial overreach. The President (whoever it may be) has the legal authority to ban anyone except actual legal citizens from entry into the United States. No non-citizen has the right to enter the United States territory just because he wants to.
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 10:09 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 10:04 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: It was judicial overreach. The President (whoever it may be) has the legal authority to ban anyone except actual legal citizens from entry into the United States. No non-citizen has the right to enter the United States territory just because he wants to.
The President has the power to make immigration policies. Yes. His power is not unreviewable. That was a claim made by this administration, and this claim was rebuked by the courts. Unanimously.
Protip: don't get your news from @RealDonaldTrump.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 28314
Threads: 114
Joined: February 22, 2011
Reputation:
159
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 10:14 pm
(February 9, 2017 at 9:52 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: (February 9, 2017 at 9:47 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: What nonsense, pray tell?
Interjecting their personal political views into legal matters (immigration, national security involving foreign and domestic enemies) that the President clearly has the sole right to determine.
Quote:There is no precedent to support this claimed
unreviewability, which runs contrary to the fundamental
structure of our constitutional democracy. . . . .
. . . . Although our jurisprudence has long counseled
deference to the political branches on matters of immigration
and national security, neither the Supreme Court nor our
court has ever held that courts lack the authority to review
executive action in those arenas for compliance with the
Constitution. To the contrary, the Supreme Court has
repeatedly and explicitly rejected the notion that the political
branches have unreviewable authority over immigration or
are not subject to the Constitution when policymaking in that
context.
~ 9th Circuit Court Ruling (here)
Talking out of your ass again, WOG?
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 10:15 pm
Does he have another orifice?
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 5492
Threads: 53
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: 9th Circuit Tells the WLB to Go Fuck Himself
February 9, 2017 at 10:20 pm
Probably didn't help when Giuliani came out with Trump asking him how to make a Muslim Ban legal. After that, however the EO ended up reading, it was going to be legally and constitionally suspect.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
|
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
