Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 7:52 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
LHC disproves ghosts
#41
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 1:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ahh, but I didn't make the claim, I'm only stating what the bible says a spirit is.

So tell us, do you think that the bible's description of a spirit is a trustworthy representation of reality?
If yes, then what makes you think so? Why do you accept it as representative of reality?

How, do you imagine, the people who wrote the bible came across that description?
Could any of us come across it, too, if we had never heard of the bible nor of its contents?
Reply
#42
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 18, 2017 at 9:47 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(February 18, 2017 at 9:24 pm)dyresand Wrote: Well looks like we were right i mean ghosts don't exists otherwise hell there would be a whole new area of science. 

http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/201...hosts.html

Wrong, that whole premise is based upon a spirit being a part of the physical, which it isn't.

How does the non-physical interact with the physical?
Reply
#43
LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 1:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ahh, but I didn't make the claim, I'm only stating what the bible says a spirit is.
You are deliberately telling a non truth. You never referenced the Bible. You made a freestanding claim.

Quote:Oh and I should add that the bible also mentioned that time is relative, I imagine a few centuries back that was also not provable.
This has nothing to do with the discussion.
Reply
#44
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
Who cares what the Bible says? This is a book that reports on talking snakes ... why should I take any word in it seriously?

Reply
#45
LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Who cares what the Bible says? This is a book that reports on talking snakes ... why should I take any word in it seriously?


A talking donkey too.
Reply
#46
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
I wonder how much knowledge taken from the bible was used to build the machine?
Reply
#47
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 1:35 pm)KKUSA Wrote:
(February 19, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Who cares what the Bible says? This is a book that reports on talking snakes ... why should I take any word in it seriously?


A talking donkey too.

Eddie Murphy's part in the bible was gold.
Cunt
Reply
#48
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
By definition ghosts would need to interact with the physical world to have any meaningful existence:- Poltergeists, apparitions, disembodied presences, anything that acquired information regarding your personality, beliefs, experiences...

Even if they existed in one or more of the Kaluza Klein compacted dimensions it would not be undetectable.
I'm not convinced that Prof. Cox has the data to back up the claims he has made recently but his basic premise is sound.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?
-Esquilax

Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
Reply
#49
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 1:35 pm)KUSA Wrote:
(February 19, 2017 at 1:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Who cares what the Bible says? This is a book that reports on talking snakes ... why should I take any word in it seriously?


A talking donkey too.

You should have mentioned the talking donkey earlier. That changes everything!
Reply
#50
RE: LHC disproves ghosts
(February 19, 2017 at 7:28 am)pocaracas Wrote:
(February 19, 2017 at 1:57 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ahh, but I didn't make the claim, I'm only stating what the bible says a spirit is.

So tell us, do you think that the bible's description of a spirit is a trustworthy representation of reality?
If yes, then what makes you think so? Why do you accept it as representative of reality?

How, do you imagine, the people who wrote the bible came across that description?
Could any of us come across it, too, if we had never heard of the bible nor of its contents?

Well, I already provided you with one concept already, which was the relativity of time. The bible clearly states that time is relative, and that concept is something we can trust because it's correct.

Another concept is original seed. In the beginning every seed God originally created he gave the ability to reproduce after it's kind, hybridization/genetically modification removes this ability (because it was never part of the original creation) making the seed sterile.
Quote:And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

Again another concept that we can trust.

Quote:https://extension.illinois.edu/hortihints/0008c.html

Not every plant’s seeds are worth keeping. Hybrid plants are developed by crossing specific parent plants. Hybrids are wonderful plants but the seed is often sterile or does not reproduce true to the parent plant. Therefore, never save the seed from hybrids.

Therefore when Bible states that God is a spirit, this obviously means that a spirit is not part of this physical universe because God clearly existed before the universe was created.
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)