Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 25, 2024, 11:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
#11
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
Five light seconds.

Less than I expect from Iggy, to be honest...

Tongue
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#12
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
Beccs, did you take into account the slowing down of time at warp 1?
For those on earth it'll be quite a bit longer?

I basically farted for an eternity!
Also, does time in heaven pass at the same rate?
Theists, what's the general consensus? What is their GMT offset?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#13
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
I wish I could time travel and return when my kids are the same age as me now. "Who's an old fart now? Ha !"
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!






Reply
#14
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 19, 2017 at 11:17 pm)KUSA Wrote:
(February 19, 2017 at 10:56 pm)pool the great Wrote: How would that even work? Does the cell growth slow down or something when you travel at the speed of light?
Yes. Everything on the quantum level slows down. A photon which of course is traveling at the speed of light, doesn't even experience time passing at all.

Hear me out: 

Say it takes "x" 4 seconds to go from a to e. (a->b= 1 sec, b->c= 1 sec, c->d= 1 sec, d->e=1 sec : 4 seconds)
If we allocate only 2 seconds for x to go from a to b -> then (a->b=1/2 sec, b->c = 1/2 sec, c->d= 1/2 sec, d->e=1/2 sec : 2 seconds)

^^ That's what I'm saying. According to what I'm saying the end result would be same no matter how fast or slow you are. (You would age the same.)

Here's what you're saying: 

If we allocate only 2 seconds for x to go from a to b -> then (a->b=1 sec, b->c = 1 sec : 2 seconds). So x essentially "slows down"(according to you). My question is - how do you arrive at this conclusion and not the one I described above?

Let's say I roll a ball from point a to point b. It takes the ball 4 seconds for it to get from a to b.

Let's say I(go back in time and) roll the same ball from point a to point b. This time it takes the ball 2 seconds to get from a to b.

Is there any difference between the ball I have at b in the first scenario and the ball I have at b in the second scenario?
Reply
#15
Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 20, 2017 at 12:17 am)ignoramus Wrote: Beccs, did you take into account the slowing down of time at warp 1?

There is no time dilation at warp speed.
Reply
#16
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 20, 2017 at 12:52 am)pool the great Wrote:
(February 19, 2017 at 11:17 pm)KUSA Wrote: Yes. Everything on the quantum level slows down. A photon which of course is traveling at the speed of light, doesn't even experience time passing at all.

Hear me out: 

Say it takes "x" 4 seconds to go from a to e. (a->b= 1 sec, b->c= 1 sec, c->d= 1 sec, d->e=1 sec : 4 seconds)
If we allocate only 2 seconds for x to go from a to b -> then (a->b=1/2 sec, b->c = 1/2 sec, c->d= 1/2 sec, d->e=1/2 sec : 2 seconds)

^^ That's what I'm saying. According to what I'm saying the end result would be same no matter how fast or slow you are. (You would age the same.)

Here's what you're saying: 

If we allocate only 2 seconds for x to go from a to b -> then (a->b=1 sec, b->c = 1 sec : 2 seconds). So x essentially "slows down"(according to you). My question is - how do you arrive at this conclusion and not the one I described above?

Let's say I roll a ball from point a to point b. It takes the ball 4 seconds for it to get from a to b.

Let's say I(go back in time and) roll the same ball from point a to point b. This time it takes the ball 2 seconds to get from a to b.

Is there any difference between the ball I have at b in the first scenario and the ball I have at b in the second scenario?

The difference is between the time passing during the trip as measured by yourself and the time measured from the vantage point of the ball. The two are not the same, the clock and all physical processes moving with the ball will be lagging slightly behind your own clock.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#17
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 20, 2017 at 12:17 am)ignoramus Wrote: I basically farted for an eternity!
Also, does time in heaven pass at the same rate?
Theists, what's the general consensus? What is their GMT offset?

Presumably as 'heaven' is now considered to be beyond the Universe, if it exists it does so outside of any space-time reference, thus eternity would be as nothing.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?
-Esquilax

Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
Reply
#18
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 20, 2017 at 1:33 am)KUSA Wrote:
(February 20, 2017 at 12:17 am)ignoramus Wrote: Beccs, did you take into account the slowing down of time  at warp 1?

There is no time dilation at warp speed.

The nerds have spoken!

Qapla!
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply
#19
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
Wessels!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#20
RE: Time traveling is just full of crap, innit?
(February 20, 2017 at 4:41 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Wessels!

Nuclear wessels.

As much as I enjoyed Chekov in the movies, Walter Koenig was great as Bester in B5
Dying to live, living to die.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Space-Time: The Bopdie Twins: If Space is Expanding Isn't Time Expandin Too? Rhondazvous 14 1733 August 2, 2017 at 8:06 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Sir Isaac Newton Time life magizines "Greatest scientific thinker of our time" franca 6 5886 October 6, 2012 at 1:48 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Full color panorama from Mars lander Curiosity Jackalope 9 5770 August 13, 2012 at 10:52 am
Last Post: KichigaiNeko



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)