Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 7:56 pm
I'm writing an essay that basically is arguing against everything I believe in both while a Deist and now as a Muslim, about morality.
I am going the Devil's advocate route.
Basically I want to be able to justify illicit relationships of any kind as well as having a sex with a real live bear by a woman but not universally, but just in her particular case.
What I can't argue that is that all society should do that. So I will be arguing that morality is dynamic, it depends on the state and knowledge of the individual and their thought process, their strengths and weakness, and there is no universal way nor is there a static way that everyone has to adhere to.
I have a lot of arguments for it, but I'm interested to hear thoughts here.
The essay context is of a book called "Bear".
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 8:10 pm
Bears will only have oral sex with humans and they do swallow. They can swallow a lot in one sitting.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 27243
Threads: 519
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 8:52 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2018 at 8:55 pm by brewer.)
Only anal sex and call your bear Poo.
Thought on concept: If you pick something more reasonable than sex with a bear you might create a more intelligent sounding paper.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:02 pm
I don't really choose the books we studied.
Posts: 27243
Threads: 519
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
90
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:16 pm
(May 2, 2018 at 9:02 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I don't really choose the books we studied.
There is a book about sex with a bear?
MK, you might finally be hanging with the right crowd.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:41 pm
So far I'm going on the lines of:
One cannot act according to strength and potentiality of others. (Talk about the book in that respect)
One knows their circumstances best and is best fit to asses situation they are in. (talk about the book in that respect)
Sometimes two opposite paths are like red and green colours, they lead to different outcomes, but it's just a color, not right or wrong. (etc)
One responds to their own impulse and their impulse is best understood by them. (etc)
Two different choices in states even with all circumstances, just means, it's that, a different choice, and they both maybe equally valid even if opposite. (etc)
Posts: 66328
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:44 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2018 at 9:52 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
You don't really need any novel moral arguments. There are many illicit relationships and actions that are not in any way immoral. Fucking a melon is illicit. Mixing meat and diary is illicit. Drinking is illicit. Homosexuality is illicit. Polygamy is illicit. Hell, not waiting for a red light to turn on an empty stretch of flat road at 3am is illicit.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:45 pm
What am I'm arguing, they be immoral for someone but someone else it's not immoral.
Posts: 66328
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I think that's going to be an unnecessarily difficult lift, personally. You'll be arguing for complete moral relativism.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 8214
Threads: 394
Joined: November 2, 2011
Reputation:
44
RE: dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality
May 2, 2018 at 9:55 pm
(May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm)Khemikal Wrote: I think that's going to be an unnecessarily difficult lift, personally. You'll be arguing for complete moral relativism.
No, it won't. It's arguing for dynamic morality, not that everyone can decide morality, but that it changes person to person, state to state, condition to condition.
Relative morality would be everyone decides what their morality is, or do I got it wrong?
|
