Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 27, 2024, 2:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
#1
New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Watch this animation below:

[Image: 110316_Erdbebenanimation_klein?binary=tr...anguage=en]

16.03.2011 | Potsdam: The earthquake disaster on 11 March 2011 was an event of the century not only for Japan. With a magnitude of Mw = 8.9, it was one of the strongest earthquakes ever recorded worldwide. Particularly interesting is that here, two days before, a strong foreshock with a magnitude Mw = 7.2 took place almost exactly at the breaking point of the tsunami-earthquake. The geophysicist Joachim Saul from the GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences (Helmholtz Association) created an animation which shows the sequence of quakes since March 9.

The animated image is available at http://www.gfz-potsdam.de . It shows the earthquake activity in the region of Honshu, Japan, measured at the GFZ since 8 March 2011. After a seismically quiet 8th March, the morning (coordinated universal time UTC) of the March 9 began with an earthquake of magnitude 7.2 off the Japanese east coast, followed by a series of smaller aftershocks. The morning of March 11 sees the earthquake disaster that triggered the devastating tsunami. This earthquake is followed by many almost severe aftershocks, two of which almost reach the magnitude 8. In the following time period the activity slowly subsides, and is dominated today (March 16) by relatively small magnitude 5 quakes, though several earthquakes of magnitude 6 are being registered on a daily basis. The activity of aftershocks focuses mainly on the area of the March 11 earthquake. Based on the distribution of the aftershocks, the length of the fraction of the main quake can be estimated at about 400 km. Overall, 428 earthquakes in the region of Honshu were registered at the GFZ since March 9.

By analysing over 500 GPS stations, the GFZ scientists Rongjiang Wang and Thomas Walter have found that horizontal displacements of up to five meters in an eastern direction occurred at the east coast of Japan. The cause lies in the earthquake zone, i.e. at the contact interface of the Pacific plate with Japan. Computer simulations of this surface show that an offset of up to 25 meters occurred during the earthquake. Calculations of the GFZ modeling group headed by Stephan Sobolev even yielded a displacement of up to 27 meters and a vertical movement of seven meters. This caused an abrupt elevation in the deep sea, and thus triggered the tsunami. The images of the GPS displacement vectors and the computer simulations can also be found among the online material provided by the GFZ.

Already shortly after the quake Andrey Babeyko and Stephan Sobolev of the GFZ modeled the propagation and wave heights of the tsunami in the Pacific over the first 16 hours. The tremendous force of the earthquake is highlighted here, too: in the open Pacific, relatively large wave heights of over one meter were calculated, which agrees very well with the observations. How high the tsunami is piled up on the coast is largely determined by water depth and the shape of the coastline. The GFZ material also contains an image and an animation regarding this work.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#2
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Sorry orogeo your insert didn't work

Try these
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/asia...57349.html
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs...n-may-have
http://www.abc.net.au/news/infographics/earthquakes/
http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/portal/gfz/Pub...ebenablauf
http://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/video/dis...n-13126535
http://www.gfz-potsdam.de/portal/gfz/Pub...001_+Japan (this take a while to load)

Awesome place our planet eh??

For your viewing pleasure

http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/japan-...eafter.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/japan-...eafter.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/...tion=world
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/...tion=world
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/...tion=world
"The Universe is run by the complex interweaving of three elements: energy, matter, and enlightened self-interest." G'Kar-B5
Reply
#3
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
(March 17, 2011 at 5:40 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: Sorry orogeo your insert didn't work

Don't know why you would say that. It works fine for me. You have to wait about 10 seconds before the quakes start appearing on the map. It does work.

'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#4
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Doesn't work for my browser ( safari)
Reply
#5
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
(March 17, 2011 at 11:55 am)Chuck Wrote: Doesn't work for my browser ( safari)

If your browser has animated gifs blocked, it might prevent you from seeing it.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#6
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Looks like chrome doesn't accept it either. Hmm, it's because the "image" is not sending a mime-type, so a browser doesn't know what to do with it.
Reply
#7
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
(March 17, 2011 at 3:49 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Looks like chrome doesn't accept it either. Hmm, it's because the "image" is not sending a mime-type, so a browser doesn't know what to do with it.

I'm using IE9, and it works fine. It also works on my laptop, which has IE8. It is an animated gif. Some browsers by default don't display them, so you should check your settings. Try going to the link in the text and see if it works there.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#8
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Were the large foreshocks and aftershocks not of the same type of motion as the main shock? Why were there no major vertical displacement of the crust on the side of the thrust fault to generate tusanmis with these shocks?
Reply
#9
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
(March 17, 2011 at 4:08 pm)Chuck Wrote: Were the large foreshocks and aftershocks not of the same type of motion as the main shock? Why were there no major vertical displacement of the crust on the side of the thrust fault to generate tusanmis with these shocks?

As far as I can tell, most, if not all of the foreshocks and aftershocks had similar motion as the main shock (in other words, they were thrust fault temblors). The main shock was the only one large enough and shallow enough to rupture the surface, and so was the only one capable of of displacing the seafloor, causing a tsunami. And displace the seafloor it certainly did - the relative displacement (between the hanging wall and the foot wall) was something like 25 meters (about 80 feet). By comparison, even though the 2004 Sumatran earthquke was larger (it ruptured nearly 1,000 km of fault), the relative displacement was only about 65 feet.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#10
RE: New findings on the developments of the earthquake disaster
Did the quake cause any downward displacement and permanent drowning of the coastal region behind the headwall like there was on the coast of Oregon as a result of the 1700 Cascadia quake? Since the Cascadia trench appears to be substantially closer to coast then the one off Japan, a rupture on the Cascadia trench will give much shorter warning time between quake and Tsunami. Is there any study on what sort of Tsunami would result from shelf and coastal topography off Oregon?

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rosetta's ROSINA instrument findings Rob216 1 632 December 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)