Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 1, 2024, 11:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Science of Atheism
#91
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 12:29 pm)Foxaèr Wrote: If the bible cannot be taken literally, there's no reason to believe anything contained within is accurate or realistic.

There's only one literal interpretation of the Bible.  You just read it off the page.  But there's as many non-literal interpretations of the Bible as there are would-be defenders.
Reply
#92
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 8:32 pm)LinuxGal Wrote:
(September 21, 2023 at 12:29 pm)Foxaèr Wrote: If the bible cannot be taken literally, there's no reason to believe anything contained within is accurate or realistic.

There's only one literal interpretation of the Bible.  You just read it off the page.  But there's as many non-literal interpretations of the Bible as there are would-be defenders.

We know it's the word of god but this is what god really meant? Hehe
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
Reply
#93
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 8:35 pm)brewer Wrote:
(September 21, 2023 at 8:32 pm)LinuxGal Wrote: There's only one literal interpretation of the Bible.  You just read it off the page.  But there's as many non-literal interpretations of the Bible as there are would-be defenders.

We know it's the word of god but this is what god really meant? Hehe

"Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation."  - Peter's hot-take on scripture
Reply
#94
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 11:17 am)Data Wrote: But I do have an announcement. The games are over as of now. I learned long ago that when posting on atheist forums the participants need certain bones cast in their direction. Here I've chosen one. Give them a scapegoat.
The people's sins were ritually laid upon the scapegoat and the poor animal was cut loose.  In this case, the sins are entirely your own.
Reply
#95
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 11:17 am)Data Wrote: But I do have an announcement. The games are over as of now. I learned long ago that when posting on atheist forums the participants need certain bones cast in their direction. Here I've chosen one. Give them a scapegoat.

How many forums have you been booted off, atheist or Christian ?

Too bad for you, it's not even a bone. 
In the Bible, a scapegoat is one of a pair of kid goats that is released into the wilderness, taking with it all sins and impurities, while the other is sacrificed. The concept first appears in the Book of Leviticus, in which a goat is designated to be cast into the desert to carry away the sins of the community." 

So what ?
They're still sacrificing the other one, (of course ... the priests have to take their cut).
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
#96
RE: Science of Atheism
The Judean priests who assembled / wrote / made up the Bible, wrote in the law about "molten" images, (usually gold). 
In the story in Exodus where Moses comes down from the mountain and finds the people worshipping the "golden calf) it's molten. 
Too much like "idol worship". When the Northern tribes seceded, they set up a worship site and instead of the gold plated sphynxes on the (supposed) site in Jerusalem 
In the South, the presence of Yahweh in the temple was thought to "sit" on the two (gold-plated sphynxes ... the concept for which came from Babylon. They were not "angels".
The priests in the North put in place two golden bulls. The Judean priests (in writing Exodus that way) were slamming their rival priests in the North who had set up a molten image. 
A great deal of the OT is not religions, but simply political. Priests slamming rival priest groups. The story above is a tiny part of a long story.
Some day I'll edit it, and post it.

The centers of his (Jeroboam's new sect in the North were at Dan up in the far North, and Beth-el, which is not far from Jerusalem. He creates new holidays, appoints new priests, and creates new symbols.
Jeroboam's new national holiday was also in the Fall, but a month later than Judah's holiday.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
#97
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 21, 2023 at 11:17 am)Data Wrote: Incidentally, if you haven't noticed I often refer to the possibility of me getting bored and leaving. In my mind the worst thing you could possibly do to me is ignore me. Not push a button and make me disappear, that's lovely, I mean to literally and manually ignore me. How boring would that be? I wouldn't last long with that. 
That's exactly what happened.  You were already being ignored by the ones you wanted to troll, so you said fuck it and revealed the hand in your sock.
Reply
#98
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 10:51 am)Deesse23 Wrote: There is no science of atheism.

Why write a multi paragraph post, why even create a thread about nothing?

[Image: 20012.jpg]
Reply
#99
RE: Science of Atheism
(September 20, 2023 at 9:22 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Back then "atom" simply meant the smallest thing you could think of philosophically that could not be divided any further. They had no idea what a Higgs/Boson particle was back then.
We no longer call the Higgs boson the "God Particle" because now there's evidence that it exists.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Atheism VS Christian Atheism? IanHulett 80 27181 June 13, 2017 at 11:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 12532 January 18, 2015 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: helyott
  Strong/Gnostic Atheism and Weak/Agnostic Atheism Dystopia 26 12169 August 30, 2014 at 1:34 pm
Last Post: Dawsonite
  Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! Duke Guilmon 8 3373 April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm
Last Post: MJ the Skeptical
  Debate share, young earth? atheism coverup? atheism gain? xr34p3rx 13 10509 March 16, 2014 at 11:30 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  Favorite videos on atheism or science? Clueless Morgan 10 3673 November 4, 2013 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: Napoléon
  Atheism, Theism, Science & Philosophy Love 213 60785 May 8, 2013 at 2:20 pm
Last Post: Love
  Would you be an atheist if science and reason wasn't supportive of atheism? Vincenzo Vinny G. 151 62841 December 9, 2012 at 4:27 pm
Last Post: Samson1
  A different definition of atheism. Atheism isn't simply lack of belief in god/s fr0d0 14 12034 August 1, 2012 at 2:54 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  "Old" atheism, "New"atheism, atheism 3.0, WTF? leo-rcc 69 38143 February 2, 2010 at 3:29 am
Last Post: tackattack



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)