Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 16, 2024, 4:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
#11
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
Yeah that is exactly what I said my friend probability is not 100% accurate it's just an educated guess about what is the most likely answer.It's a high probability that since the sun rises and sets every day for the past 12 billion years it will most likely rise again tommorow.Just educated guesses based on past knowledge and experience depending on what it is you are trying to prove or disprove.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition

http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/

Reply
#12
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
(February 8, 2009 at 12:44 pm)chatpilot Wrote: Yeah that is exactly what I said my friend probability is not 100% accurate it's just an educated guess about what is the most likely answer.It's a high probability that since the sun rises and sets every day for the past 12 billion years it will most likely rise again tommorow.Just educated guesses based on past knowledge and experience depending on what it is you are trying to prove or disprove.

Actually it's 4.5 billion years. Give or take.

Not that I'm be pedantic Cool Shades
[Image: cinjin_banner_border.jpg]
Reply
#13
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
Probability is a measurement. Not a thing to be measured itself. You don't need to ask if a degree celsius is accurate, but is the temperature outside indeed 0 degrees Celsius today. You dont need to ask if a mph is accurate, but does your car drive 55 mph at the moment.
Best regards,
Leo van Miert
Horsepower is how hard you hit the wall --Torque is how far you take the wall with you
Pastafarian
Reply
#14
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
Thanks Darwinian lol 4.5 billion it is.But I was referring to the estimated age of the universe in general not the estimated age of the Earth.I was off by a billion years or so according to Wikipedia:

The universe is about 13.5 to 14 billion years old, from the Big Bang to the present. The half billion year uncertainty allows for a number of different methods of measurement to all fall "within it" and be in agreement. Certainly there may be some other estimates of the age of the universe, but this is a scientific one. It is almost universally accepted by scientists today.

Thats my fault or mental fatigue lol I was not thinking about the age of the Earth when I used the example of the sun rising and setting so thanks once again for the correction.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition

http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/

Reply
#15
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
(February 8, 2009 at 2:29 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: Probability is a measurement. Not a thing to be measured itself. You don't need to ask if a degree celsius is accurate, but is the temperature outside indeed 0 degrees Celsius today. You dont need to ask if a mph is accurate, but does your car drive 55 mph at the moment.
Very interesting (and makes total sense I'm just interested in these things lol).

Thanks for clearing that up.

Intuitively that's what I believe and understand - I just didn't quite understand why exactly....

You don't need to measure measurement itself - therefore it is neither 'taken as gospel' nor does it have a probability put on itself.

I see that it doesn't really make sense to put a probability on probability itself....

Since its never the probability thats wrong - only that it is sometimes wrong when compared to - well whatever.

0.2% probability isn't wrong in itself....

But it would be almost certainly (lol Tongue) wrong if you said that the chance the sun will come up tomorrow is 0.2% - to say the least!

Ok that's cool. My confusion is gone - at least for the now I think!! On this subject anyway - I think!

Evf
Reply
#16
RE: The probability of the accuracy of probability itself? Etc.
Lol Evf you have been enlightened my friend.
There is nothing people will not maintain when they are slaves to superstition

http://chatpilot-godisamyth.blogspot.com/

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What's the probability that 3 out of 23 people will share the same birthday? FlatAssembler 28 3082 February 16, 2022 at 12:15 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Frog probability Aractus 17 3730 April 22, 2016 at 9:16 pm
Last Post: Aractus
  Probability question: names in hats robvalue 78 10059 March 19, 2016 at 6:39 pm
Last Post: emjay
  The role of probability in solving the Monty Hall problem Excited Penguin 209 12444 March 15, 2016 at 4:30 am
Last Post: robvalue
  If 0.999(etc) = 1, does 1 - 0.999 go to zero? Euler 26 8976 April 30, 2013 at 12:17 pm
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  If 0.999 (etc.) = 1, does 1 - 0.999 = 0? Child of Stardust 16 10647 March 6, 2012 at 2:12 pm
Last Post: Child of Stardust
  Evidence and probability go hand in hand? Edwardo Piet 13 5540 November 7, 2008 at 9:46 am
Last Post: Darwinian
  Probability and Evidence. Edwardo Piet 9 5613 October 15, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Last Post: josef rosenkranz



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)