Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 1:05 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
#31
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
What I am challenging is where the debate is....

And why doesn't science have a part in it?

And if it does, as I believe it does - and its a scientific debate too - then the argument starts with the burden of proof on the theist and not on the atheist...so if the theist doesn't give evidence then the atheist is already winning anyway - right?

I am asking where the debate IS here...what is so debatable?

I just can't imagine debating about Zeus or the FSM and the Zeus/FSM believer 'winning the debate' simply because the atheist made the logical fallacy of claiming Zeus or the FSM was absolutely disproved...

Well yeah, the atheist made a fallacy...but IF this is partly a scientific debate then there IS the matter of the fact that the Zeus/FSM believer as already losing from the outset for not giving any evidence for Zeus/the FSM!

IF it's also a scientific debate...that is

I am arguing that it is indeed a scientific debate too and that so the burden of proof and evidence would come into play; and that I never saw the part that this was specified to be specifically a philosophical argument and not at all scientific and so that the burden of proof and evidence doesn't come into play, only the logical argument..

I did not see where it stated in the OP that the debate was or had to be entirely philosophical. AND I am personally arguing that science also fits into the equation here and that evidence and existence therefore matters and not just the logical argument.

EvF
Reply
#32
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Ace answered your question long ago here:

http://atheistforums.org/thread-155.html
Reply
#33
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
I agree that science has something to say about God and this idea that they are non-overlapping is nonsense. The point being made is not whether science has something to say but that in a formal debate it's possible to lose if science is on your side if you don't present your arguments logically and correctly.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#34
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Well I guess if it was me then the first thing that would be established is that until the Christian accepts the fact that he needs evidence of God FIRST - we don't need evidence AGAINST it - then he has lost by default.

I would think that the Christian had lost from the outset in the debate...not by what was said - but by what was NOT said....

The Christian side didn't give any evidence of God...so by default the atheist side is right.

And then when the atheist side makes the logical fallacy of saying you can prove God's non-existence then sure....if we are to ignore the above line it looks like the atheists have lost....

But really the Christians have all the burden on them right from the outset. You need evidence for nonsense....

If I said that Zeus was absolutely disproved in a debate...would I have lost the debate?

Or would they be ahead because by default it is assumed they are the logical ones anyway - even if they are committing a fallacy - it is still by default far more likely to be the truth that Zeus does NOT exist.....he's just not disproved that's all.

Or....would the Zeus believer have won? There is no logic to assume that the atheist still had the upper hand because its FAR more likely that Zeus doesn't exist by default (no evidence, burden of proof, etc)?

If you claim negative proof you have lost even if probability is till on your side? Maybe you should be ALMOST 100% sure rather than 100% sure....but that's still likely to be a lot closer to the truth than believer in Zeus/God right from the outset with no proof or evidence whatsoever right!

So my conclusion is despite the negative proof fallacy....the logic and probability is still a lot more on the atheists side by default...if science applies part in this debate then logically you need to give evidence of your totally unsupported claim of belief in ZEUS! or "God"!

Otherwise you are losing by default.

EvF

P.S: Before I said already lost by default...I think this is an ongoing thing and there is no absolute proof or disproof....

So its not right to say lost or won by default....losing or winning is better...

Logic is already on the atheist's side by default...because the atheist doesn't have a massively exaggerated gigantic belief based on absolutely no evidence right from the outset!

And I don't think claiming absolute proof and being 100% certain of no God...with a fallacy like that - rather than being 'merely' 99.99999999999999 recurring practically infinitely sure or whatever - is enough of a blunder to make up for the fact the believer in Zeus/"God" (whatever kind of supernatural "God") - is still claiming belief in this absolutely absurd diety with nothing logical to back it up whatsoever!

I think the Christian would still be losing right from the start! Logically! If you claim a totally absurd belief based on no evidence - you need to back it up. If someone then claims negative proof - yes that's a fallacy - but that doesn't make you the WINNER! In your belief in Zeus/Thor/Ra/FSM/"God"/whatever!

Does it?
Reply
#35
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Like I said EvF, you clearly have no idea how debates work.
Reply
#36
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Quote:The Christian side didn't give any evidence of God...so by default the atheist side is right.

Irrelevant. The Christian got the atheist to accept/make the claim that god does not exist. The atheist then had to defend the positive claim and couldn't do it. Once that premise was accepted the Christian doesn't have to give any evidence.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#37
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Well the Christian had already claimed that God existed first though right? They're a Christian...so they obviously claim that - it's what they believe right? That their God exists...

Isn't it all eyes on them first?

Or are we supposed to assume they are a Christian that DOESN'T believe in God? If they haven't explicitly stated that they do? If they have 'merely' said that they are Christian? And not claimed it...when they of course do.
Reply
#38
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
The point is that the burden of proof shifted once the guy accepted that premise.
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply
#39
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
Well if its about burden of proof here then....

I didn't think that making a second claim would shift the burden of proof from the first claim....

If the first claim isn't remotely backed up and is closer to the truth then I thought that the burden of proof would still be on the first claim...

If science doesn't fit into the equation and this is just a philosophical debate and this is just about logic...

Then I guess an atheist could lose to an FSM/Zeus believer by committing a logical fallacy right? Because its just about the arguments so the fact there's a massive claim with no evidence and the burden of proof is on that claim - then that wouldn't matter...

If the atheist commits a logical fallacy in the matter of a debate just about philosophical arguments and completely excluding truth, evidence, the burden of proof and science, etc - then the atheist could lose to an FSM/Zeus believer JUST as easily right?

So if they lose the debate or argument then that's meaningless in the sense they could just have easily lost to someone who believes in Zeus or the FSM!

The Christian God is not to be regarded as any more special than Zeus...so it doesn't really matter who 'wins the debate' if the atheist could just have easily lost to a pastafarian who genuinely believes in the FSM.....

Lol.

EvF
Reply
#40
RE: Outsmarted by a Christian, need help to contradict
You seem to think that since we (in general) agree that Zeus and FSM is ridiculous we should agree that we can't lose a debate when it's the Christian God too because they're on the same level? That's just silly. The point of compaing God, Zeus, and FSM is to show that the evidence is lacking, but at the end of the day we can't absolutely prove Zeus or even the FSM absolutely does not exist and teh same goes for God. So if you fall into the trap of asserting that, you can lose the debate. Just as you can lose a debate against UFO believers or bigfoot believers if you don't know what you're doing or how your arguing, it doesn't matter how silly the thing is that the other person is arguing.

I've actually seen a lot of posts in my blog list about atheists debating. I've heard some of the mroe experienced debator point out flawed arguments atheists make and how some atheists need to stop arguing this way or that way because it's dumb. Here's one such post:
http://atheistexperience.blogspot.com/20...em-of.html

Here is a great quote from that post:

Quote:Here's the bottom line: it's all too common for atheists to assume that the ridiculousness of religion should be apparent to everyone. The facts should speak for themselves, we say. Well, they don't. Facts don't speak, people do. Apologists use rhetorical tricks and live debates because it's a good forum to gain media attention. So what are we going to say -- that we should abandon this medium to them? Why? Are atheists just inherently dumber than theists when it comes to style and charisma? No, I don't think so. This is a shortcoming that needs to be corrected, and the time to start is now.

Here is the follow up post:

http://atheistexperience.blogspot.com/20...ebate.html

And more:
http://atheistexperience.blogspot.com/20...topic.html
"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason." Benjamin Franklin

::Blogs:: Boston Atheism Examiner - Boston Atheists Blog | :Tongueodcast:: Boston Atheists Report
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Need some help. mrunk1975 31 3145 September 25, 2021 at 9:12 am
Last Post: GUBU
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 87838 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  I need ONE good Christian... Gawdzilla Sama 31 2242 February 21, 2020 at 3:17 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  former Christians here? i need help with a research mcolafson 3 1262 August 29, 2016 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Hi, I'm a Christian. Help Me Disprove My Religion! WishfulThinking 265 59394 October 11, 2015 at 9:20 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Need Advice w/ Christian Friend DeadChannel 23 5265 August 8, 2015 at 9:29 am
Last Post: Dystopia
  I'm afraid of being agnostic, I need help TaosFlower 75 11263 January 7, 2015 at 7:44 pm
Last Post: KevinM1
Smile I Need A Sincere Christian Response Please ShaMan 58 12095 August 1, 2014 at 3:27 pm
Last Post: orangebox21
  Looking for another Christian to bash (only the sincere need apply). Whateverist 0 1040 July 28, 2014 at 4:31 pm
Last Post: Whateverist
  Yet more christian logic: christian sues for not being given a job she refuses to do. Esquilax 21 7343 July 20, 2014 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: ThomM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)