Dinosaurs Weren't in the Bible...They Never Even Existed.

[The Grand Nudger]

Prove that they didn't Stat. lol. You can't account for [insert nonsense here].

[Statler Waldorf]

Prove that they didn't Stat. lol. You can't account for [insert nonsense here].

Wait! So you can't prove dinosaurs ever existed? Then why do you beleive they did? You ascribe to blind faith?

[Minimalist]

if atheists were as skeptical about dinosaurs as they are God they would not believe dinosaurs ever existed because there is no way to prove they ever did.

All you need to do is come up with a fossil of your fucking god to redress the balance.

[The Grand Nudger]

Well, I mean if you can't account for [insert nonsense here] and if you can't refute my airtight "prove it didn't happen" argument, you can continue to behave irrationally, but the principle of yadda yadda yadda.

[thesummerqueen]

What are we arguing here? Concrete proof in the form of fossils vs Christian opinion?

I'm finding it hard to wrap my brain around how I should be skeptical of dinosaurs the same way I am of god when I've held fucking FOSSILS in my HAND, whereas god hasn't spoken to me out of a single damn bush.

[Statler Waldorf]

All you need to do is come up with a fossil of your fucking god to redress the balance.

Now this is getting good, so rocks that look like bones or animals prove those animals existed?



So then you believe that a race of giants once inhabited Easter Island and these are their remains?

Well, I mean if you can't account for [insert nonsense here] and if you can't refute my airtight "prove it didn't happen" argument, you can continue to behave irrationally, but the principle of yadda yadda yadda.

So since you are really poorly trying to mock a transcendental argument here you are admitting that the transcendental argument does prove God exists because it seems to be the only way you can prove dinosaurs ever existed and you still believe they did? Nice!

What are we arguing here? Concrete proof in the form of fossils vs Christian opinion?

I'm finding it hard to wrap my brain around how I should be skeptical of dinosaurs the same way I am of god when I've held fucking FOSSILS in my HAND, whereas god hasn't spoken to me out of a single damn bush.

You held rocks that looked like bones in your hand, that doesn’t prove a thing. I have seen rocks that look like all sorts of things. Do you have any other proof?

[The Grand Nudger]

And your bible appears to you to be a book full of credible thoughts, but is everything that looks like a book full of credible thoughts actually a book full of credible thoughts? Of course not! Toss that shit in the garbage.

Those are nice sculptures btw. Proof positive of the existence of sculptures. Giants, not so much.

[thesummerqueen]

Did anyone ever explain to him that rocks...aren't...fossils...or vice-versa?

[The Grand Nudger]

Yes, but that doesn't help his bullshit horn to sound off now does it?

[Statler Waldorf]

And your bible appears to you to be a book full of credible thoughts, but is everything that looks like a book full of credible thoughts actually a book full of credible thoughts? Of course not! Toss that shit in the garbage.

We are talking about dinosaurs here, stay on point please.

Those are nice sculptures btw. Proof positive of the existence of sculptures. Giants, not so much.

Well then in that case I think that “fossil” of a T-rex is a nice piece of sculpting too. That’s proof of the existence of sculptures as well, not dinosaurs.

Did anyone ever explain to him that rocks...aren't...fossils...or vice-versa?

Did anyone ever explain to you that fossils are indeed mineralized rocks ? You are assuming the very thing you are trying to proof by making a distinction between the rocks you call “fossils” and the rocks that just happen to look like other things.