Current time: 19th June 2013, 15:06
Our server costs $125 a month to run. Since January 2013 we have raised $1,500!
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can.
Please help keep our community online by donating what you can.
|
Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
|
|
27th November 2011, 14:25
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
(26th November 2011 00:09)Zen Badger Wrote:(23rd November 2011 16:11)Justtristo Wrote:(23rd November 2011 14:02)Zen Badger Wrote: Kichi and I had a similar experience with another atheist forum. Now how did I know you going to say that? |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
27th November 2011, 21:41
|
||||||
|
||||||
| RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum | ||||||
![]() |
||||||
Kudos given by (1): tackattack |
|
30th November 2011, 11:53
(This post was last modified: 30th November 2011 11:54 by Justtristo.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
(26th November 2011 00:09)Zen Badger Wrote: Since you're Australian I'm guessing that you're probably familiar with it. Ah the AFA, even by my standards they are strident. The members on there once criticized me sharply for voting for the Liberal/National Party Coalition at the last federal election. Despite I seriously believe that Tony Abbott as PM would be no more worse than the current self professed "Atheist" Labor Prime Minister. I suspect a lot of people on there have had quite negative experiences with religions and are trying to deal with those experiences. |
||||||
|
undefined
|
||||||
Kudos given by (1): KichigaiNeko |
|
30th November 2011, 12:19
(This post was last modified: 30th November 2011 12:20 by mayor of simpleton.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
All I can say for now is that I have managed to be kicked out of 3 other atheist forums. Reason... I simply was not angry enough. Go figure? Especially with me being a self-proclaimed "gnostic atheist"...
![]() This is the first atheist forum where I might just reach 100 posts prior to being executed... ![]() Oddly enough, I'm a sort of "unofficial Moderator" in two other Philosophy forums. Most of them are atheists, but we don't get into pissing matches there... what is nice to see is that here the pissing matches are kept to a minimum. My Kudos to all parties involved. ![]() Meow! GREG |
||||||
|
Moral is as moral does and as moral wishes it all too be. - MoS
The absence of all empirical evidence for the necessity of intuitive X existing is evidence against the necessary empirical existence of intuitive X - MoS (variation of 180proof) Athesim is not a system of belief, but rather a single answer to a single question. It is the designation applied by theists to those who do not share their assumption that a god/deity exists. - MoS I am not one to attribute godlike qualities to things that I am unable to understand. I may never be in the position to understand certain things, but I am not about to create an anthropomorphic deity out of my short-commings. I wish not to errect a monument to my own personal ignorace and demand that others worship this proxy of ego. - MoS |
||||||
|
1st December 2011, 10:54
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
Yeah Sae adds a lot to the frivolity of any thread, but she's been busy as have a lot of people with Skyrim probably. I admittedly am far too serious for my own good and miss the randomness and siliness at times.
|
||||||
|
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
"A lot of people are unwilling to acknowledge anything that contradicts their worldview. So telling them that it's false doesn't necessarily slow them down. That's how urban legends get started for the most case. Like the woman who supposedly put her poodle in the microwave to dry it off. And it exploded." David Mikkelson (snopes) |
||||||
|
2nd December 2011, 23:48
(This post was last modified: 2nd December 2011 23:49 by padraic.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
Quote:Since you're Australian I'm guessing that you're probably familiar with it. Well,I've been a member of AFA forums longer than I have of this one. I find your criticism most interesting and at odds with my experience. However, I don't question your perception; it's yours,not mine.If I was interested enough I'd ask for some details so I could check,but I'm not,so I won't.. You were criticised for supporting the Libs? Fair enough too; I'll criticise anyone naive enough to support either shower of incompetents,whether headed by Lady Macbeth or the mad monk., ![]() Quote:I suspect a lot of people on there have had quite negative experiences with religions and are trying to deal with those experiences. Unlike here. I have have not yet been banned,but have left forums two in a snit. At the last one, a moderator called me a cunt once too often. The other was 'Raving Atheists'. All I'll say about them is the name is splendid example of truth-in-advertising |
||||||
|
Man is not so much a rational animal as a rationalising one.
|
||||||
|
3rd December 2011, 00:29
|
||||||
|
||||||
| RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum | ||||||
![]() |
||||||
|
6th December 2011, 09:57
(This post was last modified: 6th December 2011 10:42 by Justtristo.)
|
||||||
|
||||||
RE: Consumer survey: Atheistforums.org beats Brand X atheist forum
(2nd December 2011 23:48)padraic Wrote: You were criticised for supporting the Libs? Fair enough too; I'll criticise anyone naive enough to support either shower of incompetents,whether headed by Lady Macbeth or the mad monk., Since when I am voting for a political party, I examine all their policies and then determine whether or not they will benefit or not benefit the country as a whole. Thus the Coalition in my view was slightly better of Labor (despite Tony Abbott, who I have a mostly negative opinion of). Unfortunately what good policies the Greens have concerning social policy, it is outweighed by some shocking economic policies which would drastically decrease the Australian people's living standards (I would accept such living standards decrease, however a lot of other people would not). Anyway Tony Abbott is a pinko hippy in comparison to what a lot of US Republican politicians are (only Fred Nile comes close to what a lot of US Republican politicians are like). About the AFA members in general, they often pounce on anybody who happen deviate from the "party line" (which includes a quite left wing political orientation which I don't share). Also not to mention a moderation policy, which if it were implemented here would confine a lot of theist posters to a fantasy-island type place. |
||||||
|
undefined
|
||||||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)




![[Image: YgZ8E.png]](http://i.imgur.com/YgZ8E.png)





![[Image: 581088_388053461230197_747840490_n.jpg]](https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/581088_388053461230197_747840490_n.jpg)










![[Image: Atheismreality_zps62a2c96a.jpg]](http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k619/jcincain/Public/Atheismreality_zps62a2c96a.jpg)
