Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 29, 2024, 1:59 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
#1
The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.

I posted this to a medical and emotional support forum yesterday, in response to a complaint about the preaching on that support forum. It shot up the upvote column there so fast, that I thought "gee, maybe I ought post it here, too."

That other forum is not about atheism, but does have a large contingent of Christians which, like this and many other fora, come forth not to seek answers to questions, but to preach.

* * * * *
Bounce Ball
This preaching [Christian preaching] does not just happen here, of course. It happens on every forum for atheism I have seen. It happens on Muslim fora, on Jewish fora, on Witchvox, on neo-pagan fora, on certain cable channels that call themselves "news," and on political fora. It is a wavefront of propaganda.

You are probably aware I came to these fora as a Wiccan, but was already in the process of learning to own what I already knew, that is, without proof, the only intellectual stance one can take is atheism. Atheism is not active hatred, it is not repression of opinion, it is merely disbelief without proof.

Give an atheist incontrovertible empirical proof of a deity or its effects, and an atheist will have to acknowledge it. But when you do that, Christian apologist, realise that you have destroyed faith, for you have made your religious belief science.

And when you attempt to interject the tenets of your religious faith in the fields of science, they will be subjected to the same scrutiny as any other claim. And a disingenuous claim that seeks to distort a theory or misquote a scientist, to draw a rebuttal, and then claim there is a "controversy" to teach is a lie. It is bearing false witness. It is a sin by your faith's reckoning, and by your own faith the truth ne'er need be defended by a lie. How about that, the Bible does have something in common with science.

That said, I do not hold with the opinion that the "meek, mild mannered" Christian is not a threat. One who supports an organisation or ideal which is fundamentally corrupt, which seeks to shackle minds and freedom, is a Fifth Columnist at best.

I would point out that the Inquisition was NOT a perversion of Christianity. It was an expression of Christianity.What is the matter of a little earthly pain when the tortures of Hell await the unbeliever? It was for the good of the tortured they were subjected to the love of fellow Christians in that worldview.

The Puritans (as so often told in folklore) did not come to the American colonies to "seek freedom to practice their religion" as is often told in schools. They didn't sit down with the natives for a First Thanksgiving for God's mercy in conveying them to this land.

They slaughtered the natives in Massachusetts, and set about establishing a theocratic province. Oliver Cromwell, First Citizen of the UK at the time, was a Puritan as well. They were here with his blessing, not to escape some imagined persecution.

Salem was not a perversion of Christianity any more than the Inquisition was. Salem, and Cotton Mather, Governor of Massachusetts, were expressions of Christianity. Neither was the trial of the Witch of Pungo. (Pungo is now part of Virginia Beach.) There is a road in Virginia Beach today that traces the route the Witch of Pungo took after her trial, from Pungo to Lynnhaven Roads: Witchduck Road.

The Scopes Monkey Trial, and the Dover Intelligent Design lawsuit were not perversions of Christianity. They were expressions of Christianity which were only turned aside because the majority of the people still uphold the Secular State and its First Amendment against the predations of either the State, or of Religious Righteousness.

When Christian pickets came to my home, and threatened the lives of my (then) wife and baby son because in Virginia Beach I dared put up a Wiccan computer bulletin board, this was not perversion of Christianity, it was expression of Christianity. The Bible backs the idea of killing infidels. It would have taken one nut case out of that crowd to have deprived my family of their lives. The Navy transferred me early to a new command to protect our family. But the whole crowd supported the religious book under which those pickets and threats were issued.

And those that seek to lead us boldly backward to a new Dark Age, backed with technological terror, are enemies. Their supporters are Fifth Columnists, not "meek and mild mannered Christians." Those who do not oppose evil are part of it, and the enslavement of mankind to a Bronze Age book backed by the Power of the State is evil.

It was until recently being pushed in the Kansas Statehouse the idea that murder (in the case of an abortion doctor, in response to the conviction of Edward Tiller's murderer for gunning him down in a church), could be excused as a matter of conscious.

The Secular State is not a threat to Christianity; it is the best defence of all religious views, including Christianity. The Secular State is not opposed to religion, it is disinterested in religion. It allows all religious ideas to be presented, to be cherished or discarded in the marketplace of ideas. It does not shackle Christianity, it protects it, and all other religious views.

And when the Bill of Rights are torn asunder, and they lay in tatters at our feet, and the new theocracy orders destruction of such works as Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" and sets the Earth at the centre of the universe again, as God's footstool, those protections will be gone for those meek and mild mannered Christians as well. And if one of them dare speak against a theocratic state, they too will be guilty of heresy.

If the Christian apologist does not believe that could happen, he only need to read history to realise that democracy and liberty are fragile, easily broken when some other ideal take the minds of the people. While a fiction novella, I recommend reading Sinclair Lewis's book "It Can't Happen Here," (frequently on the ALA's list of banned books). It is a novel about how a country preacher in Vermont turns the nation into a dictatorial theocracy, using the power of democracy, the blind followers of churches that "only want to make this a Christian land again" (it never was), and the power of the State to create a theocratic terror. And Lewis was a Christian.

Atheists are the lowest percentage of any "religious" group in terms of divorce in the United States, of incarcerated prisoners, of teen pregnancy. But our Christian neighbours will tell their children to stay away from our children; they demonise us in public; they call us evil; they put us to the religious tests which the Government cannot by Constitutional law to exclude us from Government service, even my Commander-in-Chief when I was in the US Navy stated publicly that atheists and Wiccans ought have their citizenship revoked. We are required to make a pledge to support and defend "the flag, and to the Republic for which it stands" not under the Constitution, but under God, a religious test prohibited by that very Constitution, a propaganda stunt only put in that Pledge as an anticommunism stunt in the 1950's.

And ripping off Orson Scott Card's presentation "Secular Humanist Revival" - (Card was a Mormon who gave up two years of his life in missionary work, and a science-fiction writer): and to all those parents out there [who only wish to teach their child about God, and then turn to the Intelligent Design movement and its "textbooks" for guidance] what will you say when your child comes home from school and says: Today I learned what evolution really is. And you lied to me. And if you lied to me about that, did you lie to me about Jesus? Did you lie to me about sin, and repentance, and forgiving, and loving thy neighbour? Was it all lies? Why should I ever believe you again? The best and the brightest of your children will not follow you. You are the last generation.

I do not seek here to "deconvert" the Christian, or to dissuade him from his religious views. I only seek to convince the need of the Christian to represent the views of scientist, and the views of an atheist neighbour fairly. I only seek that you treat your atheist neighbour with the same Golden Rule you wish applied to yourself "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," or perhaps the Wiccan Rede "If you harm none, do as you wish."

The best line in Lewis's book is: "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the Flag and carrying the Cross."

It seems rather strange: the best defence of atheism is to read the Bible, and read history; and the best defence of Christianity is the Secular State. That seems counterintuitive, but so am I.

James, from the Left side of Nebraska.

"Be ye not lost amongst Precept of Order." - Book of Uterus, 1:5, "Principia Discordia, or How I Found Goddess and What I Did to Her When I Found Her."
Reply
#2
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
As history is a passion of mine I must mention that the Pilgrims arrived in 1620 - some 30 years before Cromwell became famous for killing the Irish and making himself dictator of the whole country...uptight asshole that he was.


Anyway, we wouldn't want some xtian shithead to come along and point out that one error and say "ha, ha, you're wrong....so god exists."

(They have been known to make leaps of logic like that.)
Reply
#3
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
(December 13, 2011 at 12:33 am)Minimalist Wrote: As history is a passion of mine I must mention that the Pilgrims arrived in 1620 - some 30 years before Cromwell became famous for killing the Irish and making himself dictator of the whole country...uptight asshole that he was.

Anyway, we wouldn't want some xtian shithead to come along and point out that one error and say "ha, ha, you're wrong....so god exists."

(They have been known to make leaps of logic like that.)

You are correct. Charles I was ruler of that period, and he was opposed to the Puritans, not favourable to them. Cromwell was only favourable to the Mass. Colony after he actually became Lord Protector of England, not before.

Since it is over two hours since I posted it, I cannot now correct the text. Let this message stand as the correction.


"Be ye not lost amongst Precept of Order." - Book of Uterus, 1:5, "Principia Discordia, or How I Found Goddess and What I Did to Her When I Found Her."
Reply
#4
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
So would you categorize moderate Christianity as the true perversion?

What would you have the 'meek and mild' Christians do to separate themselves from this fundamentally corrupt organization as you call it without giving up their religious beliefs? Do we hold it against the moderates for labeling their faith the same as those that seek to use their religion as hate, power, and control?

I agree with your post, but I'm not sure we can hold it against the 'liberal' Christians for what their radical brethren do in Christianity's name. The best they can do is speak out and not follow the political ideologies of those who wish to create a Christian theocracy. The fact of the matter is that many of the moderates see the religious right as much of an enemy as atheists do, and we do them a disservice to lump them together or label them as 'enablers.'

Not all Chrisitans are anti-science hate mongers, and if we truly want to limit the control of the radicals, they will be important allies. They may seem few and far between, but I think a good reason for that is they are less pushy and boisterous.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#5
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
I think the meek and mild should call out their fundamentalist brethren when they know they're not being truthful. Their silent assent enables the loud, obnoxious, and oppressive to become more and more extreme.
Reply
#6
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
Exactly the point that Hitchens makes. The "moderates" enable the fanatics.
Reply
#7
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
Christianity ain't nothing but death worship. First I thought this was an apologetic thread, then I thought - sure doesn't read like apologia - then there's this:

(December 12, 2011 at 10:56 pm)Anymouse Wrote:
Atheism is not active hatred, it is not repression of opinion, it is merely disbelief without proof.

Give an atheist incontrovertible empirical proof of a deity or its effects, and an atheist will have to acknowledge it.

From a Wiccan, even. I'm a witch. You don't have "active hatred?" I got plenty of spare, if you're running low. You know what "active hatred" is good for? Building patience, practicing tolerance; and my personal favorite, hiding in the bushes.

I am a moral creature; what inevitably happens in 'random' street encounter when the preachy Christian questions this cat, is that I'm assumed to be Christian. So I let 'em assume - hiding in the bushes - there's some bobbing and weaving because I lie but I do not deceive; and one inevitability follows another. And they associate YHWH with hell. And I win.

I'm an atheist, I paint atheism with a different brush; one thing I do not do is "lack of belief." And if you wanna know why, your very next sentence gives you the answer. Being Wiccan, you might not know any witchcraft; being a witch, I do. Like YHWH. Like prophecy, like Paul; like how Christianity ain't nothing but witchcraft. Which can be defined rationally as primitive psychology.

Saying an atheist has to acknowledge proof... what does that actually mean? Let me loan you some of my faith. As a Wiccan, I trust you could envision Deity in such a manner that if you were offering me proof; then it is possible I could become agnostic. Seriously.

Which is why it will never happen. They do not envision Deity; they envision us versus them. They envision us burning in hell. It is incontrovertible empirical hypothesis, and if me and you ever kick it on the same streets, I'll show you. Wanna try some primitive psychology? Go up to a 'random' Christian - tell them - I will burn in hell for you - and see what happens. Isn't that science? That's how i did it.

But then again, witchcraft is not entirely psychological; in terms of locality. There's also this:

Energetics Research:
The heart produces the body’s most powerful rhythmic electromagnetic field, which carries emotional information and mediates bioelectromagnetic communication, within and outside the body. This field affects one’s environment in fascinating ways not previously understood.

Not previously understood by straights, perhaps; but there has always been witchcraft, and witches. Like Paul.
[Image: twQdxWW.jpg]
Reply
#8
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
Quote:So would you categorize moderate Christianity as the true perversion?

Is a true Christian anything like a true Scotsman?Thinking

The holy books of Abrahamic faiths are so contradictory that the believer is forced to cherry pick his beliefs,.


The focus the believer chooses reflecst his personality,character, pathologies, his time and culture.They have nothing to with the innate nature of his religion. The reason a few religions dominate is that they are all things to all men. They happily include the mystic,the psychopath and everyone in between.

Quote:Show me your idea of heaven and I will show you what is missing from your life (anon)
Reply
#9
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
Hi Anymouse, nice to meet you!

I'd like to suggest that your examples of Expressions Of Chritianity are actually Expressions Of Christian interpretations Of Biblical Scripture, interpretations which have not only been made and abandoned over time, but which have also diversified and prospered even upto the modern age.

It seems Jesus was aware that Christians would diversify in their interpretations of Scripture, as the Bible records him giving a stern warning, that many would call him Lord, that many would claim to have done things in his name, but that he would reject such people because they would be workers of lawlessness.

I'd like to suggest that Christiany and properly interpreted Christianity are not the same thing. I'll end with a paraphrased quote from Ghandi:

I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.
The interesting thing about Truth is that Truth is still Truth even if the devil speaks it. The interesting thing about Lies is that Lies are still Lies even if God speaks them.
Reply
#10
RE: The Expression of Christianity, not its Perversion.
Quote:So would you categorize moderate Christianity as the true perversion?

NO

No true Scotsman fallacy.

Christianity has ALWAYS been a perversion of a small Jewish sect.The perversion began when Saul of Tarsus stuck his oar in and de-Jewified the sect to allow gentiles to join. (BEFORE the gospels were written)
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Have you met people criticizing atheists who use the expression OMG Der/die AtheistIn 30 4092 April 3, 2019 at 11:42 am
Last Post: Simon Moon
  If the Bible is false, why are its prophecies coming true? pgardner2358 3 1617 June 9, 2018 at 6:08 pm
Last Post: Jackalope
  Why Anarcho-Capitalism Is a Canard and Its Implications for Atheism log 110 12226 January 19, 2017 at 11:26 pm
Last Post: TheRealJoeFish
  so its the end of the world what do you do. dyresand 35 4995 November 16, 2014 at 2:49 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  does evil exist in its own right? Doubting_Thomas 38 15518 October 15, 2012 at 1:58 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Qualia Soup "Putting Faith In Its Place" Eudaimonia 20 8156 May 27, 2011 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: prayforme
  Petition the BSA to change its policy of discrimination kopper 15 5509 April 24, 2011 at 1:31 am
Last Post: reverendjeremiah



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)