|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 28, 2009 at 8:26 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: No.
Did you not read what I put or were you building a stawman?
Or is it some kind of misunderstanding? Or something else?
Anyway, I mean - b... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 28, 2009 at 11:37 am |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 28, 2009 at 7:06 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Well - I'm not saying its IMPOSSIBLE just because we can't conceive it. You can't prove a negative.
I just mean that I don't see how that is pos... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 28, 2009 at 8:03 am |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 25, 2009 at 5:23 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: DD Wrote:By your definition, biological life is 'simple'. I don't think that's the kind of complexity people are talking about here.Huh?
Well th... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 27, 2009 at 11:54 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 24, 2009 at 9:44 pm)Tiberius Wrote: DD_8630 Wrote:Surely the onus is on you to show that a Creator couldn't be less complex?That's trying to prove a negative, which you can't do. Same reas... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 25, 2009 at 5:19 am |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 24, 2009 at 9:15 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: (February 24, 2009 at 6:46 pm)DD_8630 Wrote: But what you're talking about is the kind of what I think of when I try to imagine a Creator less ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 24, 2009 at 9:41 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 24, 2009 at 3:54 pm)leo-rcc Wrote: (February 24, 2009 at 2:43 pm)DD_8630 Wrote: (February 24, 2009 at 6:29 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Supply the evidence for that and I will consider it. Not th... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 24, 2009 at 6:46 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 24, 2009 at 6:29 am)leo-rcc Wrote: Supply the evidence for that and I will consider it. Not the evidence for a creator, but that a creator can be less complex that created a universe and e... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 24, 2009 at 2:43 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 22, 2009 at 12:44 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: But they are still not as complex as the biological things that made them. At least - not yet. Maybe one day if computers and robots get complex... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 22, 2009 at 4:30 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
Post: RE: Small post Clarifying a common fallacy here.
| (February 22, 2009 at 6:17 am)Ephrium Wrote: I have in title this is just a small post, and I do not understand why so much exclamation is in here.
Do not tell me you guys cannot see the point here... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
60 |
28522 |
February 22, 2009 at 10:22 am |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 21, 2009 at 11:51 am)chatpilot Wrote: EvF I tend to disagree with your conclusion that Jesus cannot be proven to have not existed 100% based on the current available evidence.I agree with ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 21, 2009 at 6:44 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 18, 2009 at 10:36 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: But even LEPRECHAUNS are based on people somewhat.
Just as David Hume said how we take things from the real world and put them together.
E.G: ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 19, 2009 at 8:57 am |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 18, 2009 at 12:23 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I know Occam's razor says when everything is otherwise the same then the least entities postulated is the most parsimonious.
But as it says eve... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 18, 2009 at 8:32 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 18, 2009 at 7:03 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Well I guess I'm thinking that perhaps ideas altogether are statistically more likely to be based on something than be made up from scratch!
So ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 18, 2009 at 9:11 am |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 17, 2009 at 5:21 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: Well yes - that's when its called evidence.
But WHEN evidence is found - it was there all along its just no one knew of it so it was correctly a... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 17, 2009 at 8:56 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 17, 2009 at 12:56 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: All I'm thinking is that perhaps its more probable that the 'miraculous' absurd Supernatural Lord Jesus Christ of the bible is BASED on a real p... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 17, 2009 at 3:08 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Existence of Jesus
Post: RE: Existence of Jesus
| (February 16, 2009 at 6:37 pm)chatpilot Wrote: DD_8630 I have said before that the bible is a mish mash of fact with fiction and it obviously is.But I still stand by my opinion that the fantastical ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Christianity
|
107 |
37534 |
February 17, 2009 at 8:06 am |
| |
|
Thread: Logic of chance
Post: RE: Logic of chance
| Meh, it's not the first debate that's delved into semantics. Stick to the standard terminology, and you'll go far.
Good talking to you :) |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
59 |
19887 |
February 13, 2009 at 10:55 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Logic of chance
Post: RE: Logic of chance
| (February 11, 2009 at 2:16 pm)josef rosenkranz Wrote: The problem we are debating here is unanimously recognized as a controversial one, so I do not understand in the name of whom you assume the rol... |
|
DD_8630 |
Atheism
|
59 |
19887 |
February 12, 2009 at 10:50 am |
| |
|
Thread: Religion - the accepted way to express hatred?
Post: RE: Religion - the accepted way to express hatred?
| (February 9, 2009 at 10:18 am)infidel666 Wrote: That's because Europe cleverly discovered a couple of new continents and shipped all of its undesirables to foreign shores. That's how Europe purged ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Religion
|
16 |
5525 |
February 9, 2009 at 10:29 am |
| |
|
Thread: Spinning Earth
Post: RE: Spinning Earth
| (February 6, 2009 at 9:32 am)Sam Wrote: I don't think you'd be weightless, Since gravity is attraction between objects with Mass, you would still be affected by the gravity of everything around you ... |
|
DD_8630 |
Physical Sciences
|
11 |
5369 |
February 6, 2009 at 11:30 am |
