Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 19, 2024, 6:37 pm
Atheist Forums › Search
Results

Search Results
Post Author Forum Replies Views Posted [asc]
    Thread: lucent vs reverendjeremiah - debate discussion
Post: RE: lucent vs reverendjeremiah - debate discussion
(December 7, 2011 at 5:47 pm)Cinjin Wrote: @lucent lol you're not the one that got me to admit that. Long ago I admitted that all faith in any god is blind. Old books are not proof pal. Also, do...
 lucent Philosophy 9 3936 December 7, 2011 at 6:01 pm
    Thread: lucent vs reverendjeremiah - debate discussion
Post: RE: lucent vs reverendjeremiah - debate discussion
It's an interesting format and certainly should be a lively discussion. Since I was previously agnostic, I think I can represent the atheist position fairly well. My hope for the debate is that Jere...
 lucent Philosophy 9 3936 December 7, 2011 at 5:05 pm
    Thread: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
Post: RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 11:43 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: (December 5, 2011 at 10:20 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Quote:Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fuc...
 lucent Philosophy 27 6712 December 5, 2011 at 11:52 pm
    Thread: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
Post: RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 10:04 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Are you for real? You have to be a Poe. Nobody can possibly be this much of a blithering fucktard and still know how to use a computer. I refuted ...
 lucent Philosophy 27 6712 December 5, 2011 at 11:21 pm
    Thread: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
Post: RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 6:40 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Perhaps I wasn't clear in what my point was. Let me simplify it for you: I understood your point, and it is fallacious. Which you apparently realize...
 lucent Philosophy 27 6712 December 5, 2011 at 8:04 pm
    Thread: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
Post: RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 6:17 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: (December 5, 2011 at 5:25 pm)lucent Wrote: A philosophical argument can be considered to be sound if it is logically valid. Aren't you forgetti...
 lucent Philosophy 27 6712 December 5, 2011 at 6:40 pm
    Thread: I'm an atheist. Ask me a question.
Post: RE: I'm an atheist. Ask me a question.
(November 27, 2011 at 7:47 am)The_Flying_Skeptic Wrote: (November 27, 2011 at 7:38 am)ThinkingTom Wrote: Would you rather there be some type of afterlife (Reincarnation Ect included) or are you co...
 lucent Religion 36 11101 December 5, 2011 at 6:19 pm
    Thread: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
Post: RE: The pre-failure of apologetic arguments
(December 5, 2011 at 10:25 am)DeistPaladin Wrote: I'm sure most people here are familiar with Thunderf00t and his videos. Recently, he posted one on the subject of the apologist's use (or perhaps m...
 lucent Philosophy 27 6712 December 5, 2011 at 5:25 pm
    Thread: The Trap of Pure Rationalism
Post: RE: The Trap of Pure Rationalism
(December 3, 2011 at 9:21 pm)Rhythm Wrote: So, what you're saying here is that in the absence of any evidence, and without even so much as a claim to personal experience, you choose to believe that ...
 lucent Atheism 43 9706 December 5, 2011 at 4:22 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 5, 2011 at 3:58 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: (December 5, 2011 at 2:26 pm)lucent Wrote: You obviously don't know what macroevolution is if you think it is a "fundy concept". That just sho...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 4:13 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 5, 2011 at 3:47 pm)Chuck Wrote: you do realize those of your links that didn't come strictly from your ilk does say what you claim they say, right? Not only are you a moron, you are an u...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 3:57 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 5, 2011 at 2:58 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: You do know that there are a vast number of transitional fossils dont you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tra...al_fossils Apparently you did...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 3:24 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 5, 2011 at 2:12 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Quote:Here is the thing. You go on and on and accuse me of being ignorant and you don't even know the difference between micro and macro evolutio...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 2:26 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 4, 2011 at 5:54 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Ah..macro eveolution....so thats the same thing as saying a walk to the tiny mart 4 blocks away is completely possible (and god inspired), but to...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 1:50 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 5, 2011 at 10:46 am)tackattack Wrote: I will review this thread in it's entirety and post a formal debate tonight if all parties are still wishing to have a formal debate and I find here w...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 5, 2011 at 12:03 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 4, 2011 at 12:44 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: Quote:The question is "does God exist?", not "which God is He?". The new atheists wish to redefine the definition of atheism to make atheism the...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 4, 2011 at 4:01 pm
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 4, 2011 at 10:53 am)Rhythm Wrote: Doesn't matter if the jesus you've imagined loves me Lucent God is love, and that matters. If you don't love God, you reject love itself. (December 4, ...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 4, 2011 at 11:48 am
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 4, 2011 at 10:08 am)Rhythm Wrote: "I had never given your objection any thought. Now that I find myself in the position of looking like an absolute moron I'm going to attempt to steer the ...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 4, 2011 at 10:42 am
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 4, 2011 at 9:39 am)LastPoet Wrote: (December 4, 2011 at 9:05 am)lucent Wrote: What's most telling about you is that you approved of this post which said I should go kill myself: "Tape a...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 4, 2011 at 10:03 am
    Thread: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Post: RE: Atheism's Definition - Stanford Encyclopedia o...
(December 3, 2011 at 9:22 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote: The problem is that the vast majority of modern atheists do not view atheism this way. They view atheism as a lack of belief in all deities. You ...
 lucent Atheism 272 137608 December 4, 2011 at 9:05 am