|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted
[asc]
|
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: RE: Cosmological Fine Tuning
| (December 23, 2011 at 2:38 am)Chuck Wrote: (December 21, 2011 at 6:26 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You'll have to get his head out of the way first.
His cranium is very small, and won't block any a... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 24, 2011 at 7:09 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: RE: Multiverse Cosmological Models
| I'd like to mention that when I started this thread I merely asked
Quote:What do you good folks think about the multiverse theory and cosmological fine tuning?
When I wrote that it was with the expect... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 18, 2011 at 5:36 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Question to those who,
Post: RE: Question to those who,
| (December 9, 2011 at 4:19 pm)Calmedady Wrote: My question to you is, How do I go about approaching this subject with out making it sound like Im calling my in-laws liars. :thinking: I have made comm... |
|
Pete |
Atheism
|
34 |
6297 |
December 17, 2011 at 9:51 am |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: RE: Multiverse Cosmological Models
| (December 17, 2011 at 12:30 am)houseofcantor Wrote: Thus multiverse is fail. Big-time. The strings are mathematical chicanery supported by faith - a shared identity - but it is becoming more obvious... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 17, 2011 at 9:45 am |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: RE: Cosmological Fine Tuning
| (December 16, 2011 at 5:40 pm)TheDarkestOfAngels Wrote: I know - I've done the song and dance of doing more proper responses to this arguement, but the idea is that the very idea of a 'fine-tuned' u... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 16, 2011 at 8:00 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Neutrinos still travel faster than light
Post: RE: Neutrinos still travel faster than light
| (November 18, 2011 at 3:51 pm)Welsh cake Wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15791236
Quote:The team which found that neutrinos may travel faster than light has carried out an impr... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
46 |
16688 |
December 16, 2011 at 3:35 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: Multiverse Cosmological Models
| (December 16, 2011 at 2:19 pm)houseofcantor Wrote: It is theoretically possible that the universe creates itself from nothing every 5.13 x 10 ^-43 seconds.I believe your analogy is flawed. What you ... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 16, 2011 at 3:31 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: RE: Cosmological Fine Tuning
| (December 15, 2011 at 3:54 pm)Chuck Wrote: You christians are a disgrace clutching imaginatively at such straws. When I first heard of the concept of cosmological fine tuning I was quite intrigued. ... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 16, 2011 at 1:47 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Cosmological Fine Tuning
Post: Cosmological Fine Tuning
| So. What do you good folks think about the multiverse theory and cosmological fine tuning?
Paul Davies (http://cosmos.asu.edu/) is really into this kind of thing. Here is a paper I foud under his web... |
|
Pete |
Physical Sciences
|
60 |
13631 |
December 15, 2011 at 2:51 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Popping my head in for a sec
Post: RE: Popping my head in for a sec
| (December 13, 2011 at 12:38 pm)Shell B Wrote: So, you weren't banned? You just left. At any rate, I'm sure you'll do fine.N quite exactly. That wasn't the whole exchange. I was told that I cannot po... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
17 |
2343 |
December 15, 2011 at 2:11 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Popping my head in for a sec
Post: RE: Popping my head in for a sec
| (December 12, 2011 at 8:21 pm)Shell B Wrote: Anyway, my question is, if you were banned, how is it that you are posting right now? Was it a temporary ban or have you created a new account?I was invi... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
17 |
2343 |
December 13, 2011 at 11:03 am |
| |
|
Thread: Popping my head in for a sec
Post: Popping my head in for a sec
| Hi folks
I dropped out of the forum before because I was forbidden to use the word "evolutionist." I just got an e-mail from the board saying I've been gone to long and why don't I visit.
I'm a Chri... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
17 |
2343 |
December 12, 2011 at 4:59 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
Post: RE: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
| (January 19, 2009 at 6:49 pm)Tiberius Wrote: You can use the word "Evolutionist" as long as you can take people like myself ...Actually, no. I cannot take people like you whining about as basic scie... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
68 |
29396 |
January 19, 2009 at 8:16 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
Post: RE: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
| (October 5, 2008 at 10:31 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I think Evolutionist is great term...it's someone who studies evolution.Hi
I left this forum because it seemed like I was going to be prohibited ... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
68 |
29396 |
January 19, 2009 at 6:18 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Epistemology
Post: RE: Epistemology
| (September 12, 2008 at 5:14 am)Tiberius Wrote: I know it doesn't hold for quantum mechanics, is that the situation you were talking about?No. Who said it doesn't hold for quantum mechanics??
Quote:A... |
|
Pete |
General Science
|
31 |
13888 |
September 12, 2008 at 9:36 am |
| |
|
Thread: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
Post: RE: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
| (September 12, 2008 at 4:21 am)Tiberius Wrote: I think we should add this to the site rules once I get around to writing them up. That or I could simply filter the words "evolutionism" so it becomes... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
68 |
29396 |
September 12, 2008 at 9:26 am |
| |
|
Thread: Epistemology
Post: RE: Epistemology
| (September 11, 2008 at 7:01 pm)Jason Jarred Wrote: I don't think it really matters to tell you the truth, as long as science continues to adjust it's understanding of the universe and the way it ope... |
|
Pete |
General Science
|
31 |
13888 |
September 11, 2008 at 7:54 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Pascal's Wager
Post: RE: Pascal's Wager
| (September 11, 2008 at 2:32 pm)Eilonnwy Wrote: Sorry if I confused you. It's just that I've dealt with way to many people who think evidence of God is the Bible and it's frustrating. (Not saying you... |
|
Pete |
Atheism
|
30 |
24088 |
September 11, 2008 at 7:51 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
Post: RE: Is it okay for Christians to post here?
| (September 10, 2008 at 6:51 pm)Brick-top Wrote: (September 10, 2008 at 12:38 pm)Pete Wrote: How else would I refer to such people?
Sane.
This term is almost never used by people who accept evolut... |
|
Pete |
Introductions
|
68 |
29396 |
September 11, 2008 at 7:02 pm |
| |
|
Thread: Epistemology
Post: RE: Epistemology
| (September 11, 2008 at 3:56 am)Tiberius Wrote: Yes, that experiment would count as evidence for the speed of light in that specific scenario, as long as it could be verified again and again.Actually... |
|
Pete |
General Science
|
31 |
13888 |
September 11, 2008 at 6:43 pm |
