Argument from Conscience

[abaris]

That's fine. Do you have any logical objections to the actual argument of the OP.

Let's take point 6:

6) The only remaining source is something that transcends nature, the individual, and society. Such a source must be divine.

Why?

What's the evidence for other social animals not acting in the same way with the same freedom of choice? In fact, cognition- and behaviar-experiments on animals have shown differently. What's the argument for something divine being required to reach that kind of conclusion?

I simply don't see why individual choice should lead there.