Argument from Conscience

[Neo-Scholastic]

"God did it" must be a formulation, acceptable to Chad, where reconciling that the voice of conscience arises in the sub-conscious is not efficacious for him.

My position is a little more nuanced than than. I will admit, and actually already did, that there could be other options, but that I was hard pressed to come up with one. I invited other to add to the list of options and no one has yet done so. Also, I did not rule our the subconscious. That part of self would fall under either Nature or the individual or some combination of the two. Take a look again, not at the OP, which everyone, including myself, think fails for one reason or another; but rather, the Argument from Conscience 2.0. and also my latest reply to Esquilax, in which I said that the argument relies on some kind of realism and works with neither nominalism nor conceptualism. You should also note that in Argument for Conscience 2.0 I draw two conclusions 6a and 6b.