Argument from Conscience

[Kingpin]

OK! So that shows that your morality, at least on this issue, has nothing to do with God. You have made your own decision that it is wrong/immoral whatever you want to call it, and you hold your opinion higher even than god's.

Of course, what I'm hearing is that you're happy for God to be the author of morality as long as he agrees with you; as soon as he doesn't, you revert to your own morality. This is what everyone does in my opinion, they just don't realise it God is a mirror.

Additional: here's an interesting take on it. Can you list the things that you currently consider immoral that you'd be willing to change your mind about if God told you to? Same question for things that are moral. Obviously rape is not on the list of immoral things you would change your mind about.

I'm going to make a separate topic about this!

Au contrair!  I hold that objective morals are part of us and that we know right/wrong but still have the will to be selective to go against it or not. 

here's the problem with your question, it dies the death of a thousand qualification and subqualifications.  It goes back to my example about the smoke detector.  Don't mess with it.  People start redefining that and then we need to qualify by adding more definitions because people say, "well it didn't say not to do this."  There are a lot of topics that the Bible does not address.  But because we want to subjectively redefine things to justify our actions, does not mean objective morality is non-existent.  There is a simple rule and everyone wants to redefine what it means.

God said to love your neighbor as yourself, now we redefine what that means to the point it is meaningless.  Morality is not a list.  Value life, both yours and everyone else's.   But again I go back to this really being moot.  No one is perfectly good.  We all mess up.