(August 19, 2015 at 3:47 pm)abaris Wrote:(August 19, 2015 at 3:41 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Maybe because their founded was so obviously immoral.
Not more or less than other influencal people at his time. Western or Eastern.
Mohammed was simply the embodyment of an influencal rich man of his time. They all were child fuckers and in their majority warlords.
Yeah, but you aren't less immoral because you are surrounded by other immoral people. ISIS isn't immoral because of some sort of comparison with other people, they are immoral because they spread pain and suffering. The same thing applies to the past.
I've also wondered when Atheists say that Muhammad wasn't immoral because he was basically the standard leader of the time, does that make Jesus as portrayed by the bible more moral than average?