RE: Why x*0 = x
December 19, 2015 at 10:57 am
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2015 at 10:58 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(December 19, 2015 at 10:07 am)Tiberius Wrote: Also a proof by contradiction:
Let's assume you are correct with you definition of 0 * 1 = 1, and we've already proved that the algebra version of your pattern is correct(granted x*0=0).
Algebra version is correct if and only if x*0=0 so of course it's going to give a wrong result if x*0=x because the algebraic version is designed to give the correct result only if x*0=0.
That's like going into an open minded argument convinced you're the one that's right.
There can't be any * 's on the R.H.S on the algebra


