RE: Transexuals
April 11, 2016 at 7:34 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2016 at 7:36 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(April 11, 2016 at 7:16 pm)Goosebump Wrote:(April 11, 2016 at 7:09 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Again, it's a crappy situation for both parties involved, this is why suggested the option of a third bathroom as the ideal scenario. But if we're gonna talk about which situation effects the least amount of people, then I'd say there are many more women in the world than there are transgender women.
I'd argue one women having a low probability of even one of these encounters AND having the uncomfortable-ness about it is far less then the certainty of all trans gender women feeling uncomfortable every-time they are forced to use the men's room.
So which one is to be prevented? The occasional low probability of discomfort in a large population, or the certainty of always having discomfort in a smaller population?
I think in this case the effect would be less that would effect less people. Also, what makes you think it's a low probability for a woman to feel uncomfortable if a physical man walked into their bathroom/lockerroom? But again, the solution to this should be to make a 3rd bathroom.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh