RE: How about this..
July 29, 2019 at 4:43 pm
(This post was last modified: July 29, 2019 at 4:59 pm by I_am_not_mafia.)
So to summarise your trap then Drich ...
You claim to have invented a perpetual motion machine.
No one believes you.
You come up with an overly complicated design for a geothermal plant.
People show how it doesn't last forever.
You redefine perpetual.
People point out how a perpetual motion machine violates the laws of Thermodynamics.
You then claim that it was a ruse and it's not really a perpetual motion machine despite continuing to refer to it as that.
You then challenge people to explain "why the second law of thermodynamics does not apply to my perpetual motion machine as described." when it's you describing it as a perpetual motion machine that by definition means that it doesn't apply.
You claim to have invented a perpetual motion machine.
No one believes you.
You come up with an overly complicated design for a geothermal plant.
People show how it doesn't last forever.
You redefine perpetual.
People point out how a perpetual motion machine violates the laws of Thermodynamics.
You then claim that it was a ruse and it's not really a perpetual motion machine despite continuing to refer to it as that.
You then challenge people to explain "why the second law of thermodynamics does not apply to my perpetual motion machine as described." when it's you describing it as a perpetual motion machine that by definition means that it doesn't apply.
