(July 31, 2012 at 2:11 am)catfish Wrote: Sorry, I have to point out this blatant error also. Here is what you typed the second time:
"The distinction being that the claim of infallibility in the latter case is in the text itself."
So, show me where in the text that the claim of infallibilty is made...
Are you a moron or simply illiterate? Go read the post again and try to understand what the "latter case" is referring to.
(July 31, 2012 at 1:14 am)genkaus Wrote: Read page 5 and come back with some more nonsense pls.
Read it. And as before, your assumption of infallibility comes across clearly.
