Atheists; what do you base your morals on?

[ideologue08]

Calm down dear. You're quite old, nearing the end of your life. Do you really want to bow out having such a malicious vile attitude?

Min wasn't the one justifying the stoning of another human being. Now tell us again who has a malicious vile attitude.

What is wrong with asking a question? I asked for justification as to why he thinks it's immoral and what evidence or logic he's using, and all I get is a foul-mouthed rant. Is that what the Atheists of this forum are reduced to? Argument from ridicule? Not surprising that some people on here can't reason, we're looking at a very old age group in Min. Intellect isn't sharp at such an age.

---

Calm down dear. You're quite old, nearing the end of your life. Do you really want to bow out having such a malicious vile attitude?

Fuck your god, your prophet and you. Answer your question, dickhead?

I'm mesmerised by your debating skills (!)

---

hmmm... I see you used the "In the case of adultery", but this is something you can't apply to murderers.... And popular justice is almost always exaggerated and often misguided, so justice should be dealt with by a third party, aka, the judicial system.

You make a good point but we are also talking about very different types of behaviors. I don't think anyone here would disagree that murder is a far more heinous and far-reaching crime than adultery.

So, while it is appropriate for the justice system to take action on a murder which is primarily a social crime, it is a very different thing for the justice system to take on adultery, which is, by-and-large, a personal misjudgement.

What do you mean personal judgement? Why can't it also be a social crime?