(January 3, 2014 at 4:28 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You're forgetting.....
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/wannsee.asp
http://history1900s.about.com/od/holocau...abiyar.htm
Just too convenient to sit there and say the only evidence you'll accept is an autopsy done on a body that died of poison gas when the process was to burn the bodies as soon as they came out of the ovens.
History has made its determination. You do not want to go down this road.
There is science behind burning 6 million bodies. The about of energy and resources it would take to complete that task is not feasible and with any lacking physical evidence like ash piles and so forth there is no evidence it happened. Gas chambers with plate glass windows, doors that open from the inside, and lacking Zyclon B residue is the physical evidence.
Ovens were used to burn diseased corpse as not to infect the rest of the population, hair removal for lice control.
Out of 6 million I find it hard that not one body with evidence of poisoning was found. What was found was many dead from disease and mal nutrition, due to the massive allied bombing of German supply routes factory's and farms. Prisoners get fed last. And if the train tracks and trains are destroyed how to you get supply's to camps?
Lots of people died yes, deliberately and non deliberate, but there was no plan to kill all of the Jewish people. There was a plan to get them out of Germany due to their parasitic ways on nations, but no plan to exterminate them.
History is created by the victors for their benefit.
This road is one not traveled but it needs to be addressed.
Why illegal to question a historical event? If I lived in Canada or Austria this discussion would be illegal and prison time would be inevitable.
