Maybe if certain Christians weren't smug and/or judgmental assholes, they'd get a warmer response by those who don't believe in the same thing. Nothing raises my hackles more than people who condescendingly present a flawed argument, outright ignore the myriad of exceptions given to it, and then simply repackage it as though changing the style in which it was presented, in conjunction with repetition, somehow bolsters the argument itself. All while trying to convince people that this particular god and its religion is moral when the religion's own handbook presents it as anything but.
Keep in mind, I'm referring to all apologists and their ilk, not just Randy. At some point, the game becomes old and a spade must be called a spade.
Keep in mind, I'm referring to all apologists and their ilk, not just Randy. At some point, the game becomes old and a spade must be called a spade.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
