Devil's advocate for why ontology is meaningless and vacuous.
September 6, 2016 at 9:49 am
(This post was last modified: September 6, 2016 at 9:50 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Devil's advocating for some premises:
Premise 1. Subjectivity is ontologically objectively existent.
Premise 2. Moral values are purely and wholely epistemlogically subjective.
Premise 3. Those wholly epistemolgically subjective moral values reside ontologically objectively existent within all human brains.
Premise 4. Those ontologically objectively existent moral values residing in human brains are just as capable of disageeing with one another as if they were not ontologically objective.
Premise 5. Ontological objectivity is both entirely meaningless and valueless and there is no difference whatsoever between ontologically objective moral values and fully subjective moral values.
In summary I'd conclude that ontology is meaningless. 'Being' is indefinable and therefore no different to 'nothingness' because nothingness can't be anything anyway because it's nothing. There is no nothing.
Premise 1. Subjectivity is ontologically objectively existent.
Premise 2. Moral values are purely and wholely epistemlogically subjective.
Premise 3. Those wholly epistemolgically subjective moral values reside ontologically objectively existent within all human brains.
Premise 4. Those ontologically objectively existent moral values residing in human brains are just as capable of disageeing with one another as if they were not ontologically objective.
Premise 5. Ontological objectivity is both entirely meaningless and valueless and there is no difference whatsoever between ontologically objective moral values and fully subjective moral values.
In summary I'd conclude that ontology is meaningless. 'Being' is indefinable and therefore no different to 'nothingness' because nothingness can't be anything anyway because it's nothing. There is no nothing.
