RE: Exclusive: Trump campaign had at least 18 undisclosed contacts with Russians
May 20, 2017 at 11:13 am
(May 20, 2017 at 10:59 am)Minimalist Wrote: Yeah, see Scoobs, who is as dumb as a bag of cunt hair, thinks that because no one brings evidence TO HIM and personally sticks it up his ass where his head is that means there is no evidence. You are fucking clueless as to how criminal investigations work. Why don't you stop embarrassing yourself and go back to jerking off to Breitbart, you stupid ass.
There is no evidence, people have admitted it already. There is rumor and speculation, so it's really you all that look stupid for following and allowing propaganda to suggest something without evidence and you repeat it as a matter of fact. Innocent until proven guilty. It would be like me accusing you of doing something, and because I'm convinced you did, I tell everyone else you did it and spend months looking into how I can prove you did it, while ignoring all evidence that suggests it was someone else who did it. Like Seth Rich, or other leakers inside the US government.
We have all these "leaks" that could be just propaganda to build the narrative. No one ever questions the media as perhaps having an agenda. Like the example in the article posted in the original post. It even admits there is no evidence. Where is the evidence? You haven't posted it, that's for sure. Talking to Russians isn't evidence of collusion. Even the story about the Russia hack came from a DNC IT company, and to date, the FBI still have not been able to look at the DNC servers to do an investigation. They relied on a security firm Crowdstrike and the US intel agencies haven't even performed a forensics analysis which if they did could locate the source.
There is a reason nothing is happening, yet everyone is convinced something must have happened. You can blame the DNC collusion with the media.
