(July 27, 2017 at 1:55 am)Godscreated Wrote:(July 26, 2017 at 4:45 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Sure it does. It has to promise the sheep something for their cash, right?
Yeshua didn't become Jesus until after 1630 and christ wasn't associated with the Yeshua character until around 830 A.D. And Christ wasn't capitalized until the 17th Century.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=christ
So it's just a modern day fairy tale, like Ben Hur.
Your opinion and that's all it is.
GC
(July 26, 2017 at 8:51 am)Inkfeather132 Wrote: Yeah no, Paul was a moron who couldn't win an argument with a two-year-old. I just showed you the fault in his logic, but like a little child you just cover your ears an whine "nuh uh! nuh uh!" You'll probably just call me childish again, like the child you are, but I'd rather be considered childish than defend a god who allows his people to murder and rape. It's probably best that you leave this conversation, you clearly aren't capable of even attempting to argue maturely anymore.
I gave you an argument from scripture that you totally ignored, if you are going to argue against God and His word you will need to do it from the scriptures since there is no other place to do it from.
GC
I already showed you how that "argument" isn't logical. Paul judges all women based on Eve's behavior, which is not how the world works. I don't judge all men based on Noah, or all black people based on Martin Luther King, Jr. It's stupid because there is diversity in large groups. Not all women would have eaten the fruit, not all men would have just done what their wife told them without questioning. Paul's argument was incorrect and you are the one ignoring that.
Being careful is for people who can't handle surprises.