RE: Just because She's Topless
January 3, 2018 at 1:31 pm
(This post was last modified: January 3, 2018 at 1:34 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(January 3, 2018 at 11:32 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(January 3, 2018 at 11:22 am)Khemikal Wrote: Both parties are objectively harmed, as is society in general. She was groped, he was punched, and we have to live in a society where gropers need to be punched because some don't consider groping objectively harmful.
Now I remember... thanks!
What objective harm was done in groping? It seems like this would be at best subjective.... some may not mind as much, and it may even be relative to the person who is doing the groping. An external observer, cannot really tell what harm was done. What makes groping the boob wrong (from a harm standpoint), but tapping her on the shoulder not harmful? I don't think that the guy intended harm or was thinking about harming the girl. And yet she intentionally caused him harm.
Maybe if some random guy decided to pull your bollocks (presuming you're not into that, mind) your view may change?
Come on man, really? Bracketing out the conversation about her having her fun bags out in public, you honestly can't see anything 'objectively wrong with just walking up to a girl and having a grab of her titties?
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.