RE: Re-viving good and interesting topics
November 15, 2020 at 1:27 pm
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2020 at 5:47 am by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(November 15, 2020 at 1:12 pm)Dundee Wrote:(November 15, 2020 at 4:55 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You can revive any topic you like, but we have a rule against replying to threads that have been inactive for more than thirty days. There is nothing to prevent you from starting a new thread on the same topic.
And to be fair, you HAVE been informally advised about it before. I suspect that part of the reason for your warnings is that you chose to ignore that advice.
Boru
As a said before: I did not "choose to ignore" a warning.
I did not see any.
--------------
That said - can somebody tell me what "harm" is done by re-viving an "old" thread, however old it might be?
When there are 3 different aspects to a case it is a good idea to have 3 threads.
No need to be personally insulting because of it.
It seems warnings are given here for un-importent small formalities.
How boring!
But not for grave personal insults.
That is the wrong way round.
And:
It seems some "atheists" are more into stupid little formalities than some religions!
My, we are having ourselves a little moan, aren’t we?
Follow the rules, and you never need worry about being banned or even warned.
Boru
‘But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods or no gods. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.’ - Thomas Jefferson