RE: A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?
March 24, 2022 at 10:53 pm
(March 24, 2022 at 3:11 am)Deesse23 Wrote:
(March 23, 2022 at 10:05 pm)Ferrocyanide Wrote: What’s wrong with attacking the Ottoman Empire?Whats wrong with attacking Russia?
It’s been well established that turks are invaders in Asia Minor. There were already well established nations on those lands and the turks invaded, killed off people and took over.
It’s been well established that Russians are invaders in Ukraine and Crimea. There were already well established nations on those lands and the Russians invaded, killed off people and took over.
I am not claiming that it is ok for Russia to invade Ukraine. Europe + Russia went through 2 disastrous wars not long ago (WW1 and WW2). They shouldn’t even do small wars.
What I am saying is that these events are connected with the USA foreign policy of treating Russia as an enemy.
The USA’s plan is to establish military bases wherever they can, all over the globe.
Part of their plan involves bringing in ex-Soviet nations into the sphere of influence of the USA, establish military bases and have nuclear weapons ready.
The only nation that the USA does not want is Russia.
Which other nation sets up military bases everywhere?
So, how does Russia view these actions? It is natural for them to think that it is time to stop the USA.
The war between Ukraine and Russia is more of a war between the USA and Russia. It is similar to the war between Georgia and Russia just a few years before.
Quote:Please point out the article in the UN charter, the article which says that invasions of other nations are acceptable.
It is suppose to be unacceptable yet, there is Turkey that has taken Armenian, Assyrian, Greek lands. There is Turkey that has invaded Cyprus in 1974. There is China that invaded Tibet. Currently, China has sent there military near the border of India and there is some small skirmish. Russia has taken some islands that belong to Japan since WW2 and has not returned it yet.
During the Iraq war of 2001 and +, they kept telling us on the news what a jerk Sadam is and how he used toxic gas on kurds.
Why are they telling us this while they are reporting on the USA invading Iraq?
What about the Tutsi vs the Hutu? Why didn’t the USA send troops there.
What about the genocide in Darfour?
Like I said, at the topmost level and at the international level, committing crimes and getting away with it is the norm.
No country wants to send there soldiers and risk their lives to save some other people. They only do it if there is profits to be made.
There is the Bosnian thing. I’m not sure what the deal with that was. Apparently, the USA and a few countries did send soldiers to stop it.
Apparently, the international court dealt with Slobodan Milovich.