Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 28, 2024, 8:29 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
God Became a Mirage
#31
RE: God Became a Mirage
(March 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(March 23, 2009 at 6:12 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: As far as I am aware the only generalisation one can make about atheists is that they don't believe in a god or gods.
No, I think that's the only non generalisation.

No, all that being an atheist means is that you don't believe in god or gods ... EVERYTHING else is negotiable.

(March 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(March 23, 2009 at 6:12 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: That depends ... yes that is true for a theist but not as true for a religionist (someone who adopts a specific religion).
Theists are limited by interpretation and peer review.

Some theists maybe and all (without exception) do not put their religious belief through an acceptable formalised system of peer review.

(March 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(March 23, 2009 at 6:12 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: I'd put money on them not being as accurate as you think they are.
Well mine take the form of me living moments in dreams. I remember sights, sounds, smells, feelings.. Re-living them is like stopping into the movie.. I sometimes realise and have an almost 3rd person perspective watching the events repeat in front of me. Sometimes I'm not so sharp. Sometimes the event will be a long time after the dream, sometimes a very short time after. It's easy to dismiss familiar surroundings but not so unknown ones. I've not really found any use for these dreams.

OK, so you maintain you have predictive dreams. Care to test that claim? Make a prediction ... something that is beyond the normal ability of humans to rationally anticipate future events.

(March 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:
(March 23, 2009 at 6:12 am)Kyuuketsuki Wrote: So your god is part of the universe?
No, he/she/it's outside it.

OK, let's deal with that idea shall we? The following is an answer I wrote many years ago when I edited an online publication called the " UK Atheist & Science E-Zine":

Quote:Does God Exist?
By
The Editor: UK Atheist & Science E-Zine

Introduction

Despite the fact that there is no evidence to support their existence many that make the claim that a god or gods exist ... for the remainder of this article such phenomena will all be referred to as God or god. In the case of Christianity, Judaism (Jehovah) or Islam (Allah) and, indeed, many other religions the god in question is an all powerful, divine force or entity that "created" or "is" or "contains" the universe and/or watches over it and/or permeates every aspect of our lives.

Discussion
To my knowledge there are no reliable instances of God being seen, heard, touched or smelt nor is it possible to design an experiment to test for its existence or non-existence. Available evidence at least implies that men wrote whatever religious scriptures currently exist and there is no evidence to indicate that a god or gods were involved in any way. In other words there is no physical or naturalistic evidence to support the existence of God/deity.

The accepted method of investigation (science) is to propose a clearly stated hypothesis and to support that hypothesis with evidence and reasoned logical deductions based upon the same. That is how science works and is the method by which humans have discovered things about our surroundings since we were able to reason. It is also understood that if a hypothesis does not "fit" in any way with other knowledge already accepted about our universe, if it cannot be supported by evidence and it cannot provide information about our universe previously unknown then it is assumed to have no value and is dismissed.

Given the above (and the statement in the second paragraph) I can draw the following assumptions to test or discuss:

  1. God is claimed to be an all powerful, divine entity, force or effect that watches over us and permeates every aspect of our lives.
  2. There exists no empirical (measurable physical or naturalistic) evidence to support the claimed existence of God that cannot be interpreted (or potentially so) in a different fashion.
  3. There are no reliable or verifiable instances of God being seen, heard, touched, smelt, tasted or otherwise observed.
  4. It is not possible to design an experiment to prove or disprove God's existence.
  5. Humans (it would seem) physically wrote whatever scriptures or other written material supporting the claimed actuality of God and there is no evidence to indicate the direct or indirect involvement of God.

On the basis that it is the supporters of the existence of a god or gods that are proposing the hypothesis that such a creator deity exists and that the natural human method of investigation results in the dismissal of untenable hypotheses then it is not unreasonable to request that the following be provided.

  1. Hard scientific evidence to support the claimed existence of whatever god or gods are being claimed to exist.
  2. Given that such evidence can, potentially at least, be provided an experiment designed to prove the existence of whatever god or gods are being claimed to exist and an indication of what kind of data would be required to disprove the existence of the same.
  3. Demonstrable evidence that whatever scriptures support the existence of the claimed god or gods were not (as is reasonably assumed) written and designed purely by men or women without divine involvement.

The universe may be defined as "the sum of all that exists" or "the physical system that is potentially observable" and, for the purpose of this discussion at least, can be considered fully interchangeable with the term "natural universe". Science is an ongoing attempt to explain the universe and in this respect has explained or is attempting to explain all that is observable. Whilst individual scientists are not always above reproach science, as a global force, is tentative in nature, cannot always consider its knowledge to be absolute & correct but is self-correcting in nature and therefore represents our best current understanding of the universe.

To be brutal God must be one of three states:
  • God exists
  • God does not exist or
  • God existed once but does not anymore (dead).

Though it is of academic interest if there once was a god but it exists no more it is beyond the scope of this discussion and typically theists do not claim this to be so. With that in mind I move on to the first two possibilities i.e. that God either exists or does not.

If God exists within the universe then it either is/will be observable, either directly or indirectly, by science or it exists outside of the universe. If all observable aspects of God exist outside of the universe then it is, by definition, supernatural and can have no impact on the universe or anything within it and, as such, science can safely discard it. If God is not supernatural then it, some part of it or something directly attributable to it must be observable in which case it is not supernatural but entirely or partially explainable.

If God is (in principle) entirely or partially explainable then it is not, by definition, supernatural but natural i.e. a part of the universe. If God exists wholly outside of the universe then there can be no observable evidence to support it's existence and no one has any reason to believe in it let alone try to convince others that God exists. If God exists within some gap in our scientific understanding of the universe then it is not only due to one day to be explained (such gaps will not remain open forever) but is also shrinking in size as our knowledge increases.

Logically therefore God must be one of the following:
  • Everywhere
  • Part of the explained universe
  • Part of the unexplained universe
  • Non-existent

God cannot exist within the parts of the universe we have explained ... if so God would have been explained (partially or wholly) and would therefore already be a part of the natural and explained universe. For the same reason God cannot be everywhere, for if it were it would be possible to observe and test some parts of it. If it is a part of the universe that we have not explained then it must be a "god of the gaps" i.e. it exists somewhere in the gaps of knowledge we have so far failed to explain. If, as pointed out above, that is true then every time we discover something new this "god of the gaps" gets a little smaller.

The final option is that God does not exist ... this needs no justification, no proof, no evidence.

Conclusion
It is evident that, if God exists and affects us, God must exist within the confines of our universe; by definition the universe is everything that is observable and can be considered a boundary across which information does not flow. If God does exist in our universe then God must be observable. Also if God was not observable then God cannot observe us. If God is not observable then it is impossible for anyone to have experienced the presence of God, so if God is unobservable then God cannot exist and anyone who ever claimed to have experienced god (personally or otherwise) has merely experienced a delusion.

There is no validatable evidence (that cannot be more reasonably interpreted) to support the existence of God so it is hard to see why any reasoning human being should consider that one should exist since our entire investment in knowledge (by which I refer to those things we "know" or have discovered about our universe) is based on empirical data. With that in mind and with specific (& somewhat cynical) reference to claims of a "god/gods of the gaps (which presumably is where God must exist in the absence of any other evidence) it must follow that at one point that god was potentially huge but nowadays is getting somewhat smaller ... indeed one imagines that the sceptic should be careful lest he tread on the apologetic's "god of the gaps" without realising it.

Richard Dawkins wrote "It is often said that although there is no positive evidence for the existence of God, nor is there evidence against his existence. So it is best to keep an open mind and be agnostic. At first sight that seems an unassailable position, at least in the weak sense of Pascal's wager. But on second thoughts it seems a cop-out, because the same could be said of Father Christmas and tooth fairies. There may be fairies at the bottom of the garden. There is no evidence for it, but you can't prove that there aren't any, so shouldn't we be agnostic with respect to fairies?"

References
  • E-mail discussions with Iron Cestus.

So where's your god again?

Kyu
Angry Atheism
Where those who are hacked off with the stupidity of irrational belief can vent their feelings!
Come over to the dark side, we have cookies!

Kyuuketsuki, AngryAtheism Owner & Administrator
Reply



Messages In This Thread
God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 20, 2009 at 3:01 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by leo-rcc - March 20, 2009 at 4:45 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 20, 2009 at 5:25 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 20, 2009 at 6:34 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 20, 2009 at 4:07 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 21, 2009 at 6:12 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Tiberius - March 20, 2009 at 8:04 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 20, 2009 at 8:07 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 20, 2009 at 3:26 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by leo-rcc - March 20, 2009 at 3:39 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 20, 2009 at 4:47 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 21, 2009 at 2:47 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 21, 2009 at 11:17 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 21, 2009 at 5:30 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Demonaura - March 20, 2009 at 5:09 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Demonaura - March 21, 2009 at 4:01 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 21, 2009 at 4:54 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by leo-rcc - March 21, 2009 at 4:16 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Demonaura - March 21, 2009 at 5:24 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 21, 2009 at 5:27 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 22, 2009 at 3:04 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 22, 2009 at 8:59 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Tiberius - March 22, 2009 at 9:41 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 22, 2009 at 4:39 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 23, 2009 at 6:12 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 23, 2009 at 6:08 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 24, 2009 at 5:57 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 24, 2009 at 3:35 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 24, 2009 at 4:46 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by padraic - March 24, 2009 at 8:00 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 24, 2009 at 3:32 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 24, 2009 at 3:51 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 25, 2009 at 6:33 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 25, 2009 at 7:59 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 25, 2009 at 4:43 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 25, 2009 at 4:59 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 30, 2009 at 9:16 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 25, 2009 at 3:58 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 24, 2009 at 3:35 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by padraic - March 22, 2009 at 11:39 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edward - March 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by padraic - March 23, 2009 at 8:13 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Demonaura - March 23, 2009 at 4:10 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 24, 2009 at 7:39 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Demonaura - March 24, 2009 at 12:03 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Edwardo Piet - March 24, 2009 at 1:29 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by fr0d0 - March 24, 2009 at 5:31 pm
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - March 25, 2009 at 5:09 am
RE: God Became a Mirage - by Kyuuketsuki - April 2, 2009 at 6:24 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How I Became An Atheist Shuffle 15 4442 August 19, 2015 at 4:38 am
Last Post: Longhorn
  Why I Left Islam And Became An Atheist mota 9 6710 May 22, 2013 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: viocjit
  How I Became an Atheist hockeymonk 5 2567 March 3, 2013 at 12:55 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  How I became atheist Doubting Thomas 9 5257 April 19, 2011 at 6:37 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  How I became a non-believer SleepingDemon 7 2688 April 18, 2010 at 4:22 am
Last Post: fr0d0
  How i became an atheist Nicky 9 3387 October 31, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  How I became an atheist (Edited) Giff 0 1755 December 7, 2008 at 9:42 am
Last Post: Giff



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)