Let me make this as perfectly clear as I can.
Individuals have biases. We recognize this, and counter individual bias by requiring significant quorum for actions that have a significant impact on a member (verbal warnings, official warnings, suspensions (temp ban), and permanent bans).
We also have a tradition whereby someone with a clear conflict of interest will recuse themselves from a vote (or be asked to, if they don't recognize the conflict).
The process was designed *specifically* to eliminate, as much as possible, the influence of any individual bias.
If you have constructive suggestions as to how to alter the process to further reduce bias, we're all ears.
Individuals have biases. We recognize this, and counter individual bias by requiring significant quorum for actions that have a significant impact on a member (verbal warnings, official warnings, suspensions (temp ban), and permanent bans).
We also have a tradition whereby someone with a clear conflict of interest will recuse themselves from a vote (or be asked to, if they don't recognize the conflict).
The process was designed *specifically* to eliminate, as much as possible, the influence of any individual bias.
If you have constructive suggestions as to how to alter the process to further reduce bias, we're all ears.