(August 30, 2015 at 8:11 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Reading thru the posts again I think it is very revealing that the primary objection to the pro-life stance is NOT why it is acceptable to terminate a human life (other than failing to recognize it as such), but attempting to paint pro-life people as hypocrites, implying that pro-life believers 1) do not care about new born infants and single mothers, 2) do not care about the humane treatment of animals, and now 3) do not care about AIDS victims. It's really a cheap and disrespectful approach to defending the pro-choice position. Think about the flip-side of that, it suggests that if you are pro-choice then you can ignore the unfortunate, be cruel to animals and ignore the AIDS crisis and consider yourself virtuous if only because no one can call you a hypocrite.
For helping women and their babies, before and after birth:
https://www.heartbeatservices.org/about-us
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh