(July 18, 2015 at 1:29 pm)Dystopia Wrote: Read my point in the previous point about distinguishing restrictions from complete loss of rights - Restrictions of rights are necessary in any society, we all voluntarily restrict our rights to avoid hurting the rights of others. The fact I don't go into a government's property doesn't mean that I have lost the right to free circulation, it just means I have to limit it to avoid colliding with other people's rights.
Noted. I merely observe that the behavior of all governments infringes on the absolutist definition mentioned in the Wiki page, leaving aside for the moment the justice or injustice of those infringements or the theological theoretical distinctions between different kinds of infringements.