(July 19, 2015 at 3:33 pm)Rhythm Wrote: -and again, regardless of which term you or I prefer to use, moral opinions or beliefs can have truth values - according to both of us. Calling them by either term doesn't change that. Moral relativism, as comprised of opinion or belief, is not void of truth value in any specific instance by use of either term, nor do either terms or a mistake or what is regarded -as- a mistake by any person using either term (or opposed to it's use) imply or demonstrate that the objective goods don't (or do) exist. Call them fleeflarps if you like. I'm -sure- that you could fill fleeflarp with whatever connotations you desire........but it's all so pointless.Well, there's a word salad if I ever saw one.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza