(November 27, 2015 at 5:54 pm)orangebox21 Wrote:
Relative to definition #1: How are the principles of equality and justice determined?
Relative to definition #2: Why do you reject this definition but accept the others?
Relative to definition #3: Do you think that it is reasonable [having the faculty of reason] to submit the concept of fairness to a single person's 'personal expectations?' If you read a book and it fails to live up to your expectations would that book be 'unfair'?
You quoted me, and didn't read my response? "I didn't write this in this atheist forum to have a debate with a goddamn preacher."
You must not have read the other responses either. You seem to be the only poster that is incapable of immediately understanding my point.
However, I do appreciate that your responses are NOT the old, tired, and absurd crap that theists usually respond to such a post, such as: "Gods ways are not our ways; God's ways are beyond our understanding; God cannot be unfair because God IS the universe; yadda yadda yadda ad nauseum with the magical, unprovable, ridiculous bullshit.
So, I'm not going to engage in your attempt to dissect semantics and definitions, in hopes that you can find a loophole to "prove" to us that your god is not a monster. (The god of the wholly babble, not the other gods.) But carry on. Because if you have to type out this stuff enough times, you might get tired of putting on the blinders, tying your brains in a knot, and turning yourself inside out in order to make excuses for your imaginary friend.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
