(April 21, 2013 at 3:11 pm)Darkstar Wrote: Banned for dislike of dark colors.
Banned for banning himself.
But...wouldn't I have to have banned myself first to warrant banning myself originally? But I couldn't have banned myself for something I hadn't done, and so I could only carry out the ban if it were already carried out. But what if I banned myself first, and then banned myself for banning myself...but wouldn't that in itself require a ban? An infinite chain of self-banning? But what if the banned cannot ban? Then I couldn't self-ban for my original ban, but said ban would then be unjustified!
Banned for trying to hurt peoples' brains!