RE: Why was Michael Jackson stigmatised so harshly?
November 2, 2016 at 9:09 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2016 at 9:11 am by Edwardo Piet.)
If they had used that evidence surely he would have been convicted as guilty. Why on earth didn't they use it. I can't think of any explanation for them not wanting to use that evidence besides them secretly at the last minute accepting a huge bribe.
Surely there must be an explanation for that. Holy crap.
Surely there must be an explanation for that. Holy crap.