Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?

[bennyboy]

For something to be "perfect," it has to exactly match what it should be.  But what should be other than what it is?

What really happens is that we symbolize reality to a near-fit, and then blame reality when it can't conform to our own simplicity.  So we symbolize a cloud of particles as a "flat" table, look at it under a microscope, and discover there's no flatness to be found-- the particles, after all, are moving, and cannot therefore be perfectly aligned in a virtual plane.

So in short, I'd say everything is perfect except our ideas of things.

Flaws are very useful amongst the perfection.

Then they aren't flaws.