RE: Does perfection in reality never contain any flaws ?
January 31, 2017 at 4:39 am
(This post was last modified: January 31, 2017 at 4:43 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(January 31, 2017 at 3:45 am)ignoramus Wrote: Wrong!
Tell me which simple molecules have changed in 4 billion years?
Water? Nup? (and heaps others).
Okay. So let's consider water as perfect. What happens when you boil it, it turns to vapor - no longer perfect. Every molecule screw other molecules and make baby molecules.
For some thing to be perfect it must exist as it is.
(January 31, 2017 at 3:47 am)The Wise Joker Wrote:(January 31, 2017 at 3:31 am)pool the great Wrote: Hmm. Let's see, you want an example of something perfect that exists in reality. Perfection by definition means without flaw. So what's a flaw? Hmm. A flaw can be something that causes deviation from perfection.
So you want an example of something that doesn't deviate from its perfect state. Essentially you want an example of something that doesn't "age", something that exists as it is. You want something that is not affected by space time but if something exist then it will be affected by space time.
So you want an example of something that doesn't exist in reality and exist in reality because in order for something perfect to exist in reality it must not exist in reality.
(After some thinking........)
The answer is vacuum. It exists in reality but also doesn't exist in reality and is exempt from imperfection.
Where's my prize?
From my point of view, nearly. Your prize
Hmm. So that's a bit confusing... So is that like the first prize or the ..second prize? I bet it's a first prize but I'll take a "second" prize if you don't want to hurt some poor chaps heart. Just make the air quotes when you give it to me
(January 31, 2017 at 4:26 am)ignoramus Wrote: Vacuums and Gravity get all the awards ...The brown nosers know how to suck!
Nope. Gravity can be high or low so it can't be perfect in that aspect.
