The First Century Void

[RoadRunner79]

RR prefers Stroebel and Craig as opposed to Ehrman, Davies, Thompson and Carrier.  The latter 4 do not tell him what he wants to hear.

Actually, haven't read Stroebel.... though it is an interesting story.   And I have reference Ehrman here, but not Craig.  

But in the end, what I prefer is evidence and reason.  Do you have any of that, or just made up narratives, based on the difficult if not fallacious argument from silence? 
I'm not the one, trying to attack others character, or attacking the source.  I consider the need to do so, a sign of a weak argument!

---

RR prefers Stroebel and Craig as opposed to Ehrman, Davies, Thompson and Carrier.  The latter 4 do not tell him what he wants to hear.

Well yeah of course the frauds and liars appeal to him as opposed the contrary .

I would ask, that you please be specific when making such claims, and keep things within the topic of discussion.  Unless you feel your position so weak, that you need to resort to attacking the man (and those not even involved here at that).   Shameful!