(November 10, 2017 at 11:17 am)MysticKnight Wrote:(November 10, 2017 at 11:14 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: If an argument is fallacious, its conclusion doesn't follow from its premise(s). It doesn't necessarily mean that the conclusion isn't true, but if it is, the reason for it being true is not the fallacious reason given.
You really don't get what I am saying because you are so used being directed on how to think by people who really don't how to.
I am talking about language convention and people being literalists to it now and also limiting paradigms on appropriate ways to respond and a lot is just dumb and makes no sense.
Yes, it's their profession, but they are fools unfortunately with respect to the very thing they are supposed to reflect about and be experts at.
No.... I think MA understands that you just wish to pass deepities as something that's actually meaningful, when it's mostly nonsense, loaded with unsupported assumptions.
