RE: Why does science always upstage God?
December 23, 2017 at 12:19 am
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2017 at 1:33 am by Huggy Bear.)
(December 21, 2017 at 4:37 pm)ignoramus Wrote:*emphasis mine*(December 21, 2017 at 1:13 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Seriously? Your going to post the comment which I quoted above and attribute the jackoff emoji to my post?
They say those things out of frustration for the most part because they're batting for the losing team.
My questions were rhetorical... They should have not attempted to answer.
I'd rather remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt!
Too late for that buddy, you're the OP, or is that your excuse for not answering my question?
I find that science (where it's proven true) corroborates the scriptures, for example the scriptures stated that time was relative 3000 years ago, science just confirmed it, which is why I challenged any of you atheists to disprove anything in the bible scientifically, and none of you could do it.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-51134-p...pid1641081
The scriptures state that the universe was formed out of the Word of God:
Quote:Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. - Hebrews 11:3
Quote:The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever. - Isaiah 40:8
So IF matter/energy were formed out of the Word of God AND the Word of God cannot pass away, then when science states that matter/energy cannot be created or destroyed, it corroborates what the scriptures say does it not?
What I find interesting is an atheist ability to ignore evidence and accept their own version of a "fairy tale" when it's convenient for them to do so.
Take abiogenesis for example.
Life only comes from life, there is absolutely no evidence showing otherwise, if so then show me evidence of where non-life has produce life. If you can't then you make yourself a hypocrite by exercising faith in something for which no evidence exists.
What I find laughable is that you consider the act of a universe created by a supernatural being to be in the realm of magic (just because you don't understand doesn't = magic), yet in your version there was nothing then all of the sudden an explosion created everything, and you'll claim with a straight face that's not magic.
Tell me which is more fantastical... a universe having a creator, or a universe creating itself?
