Why does science always upstage God?

[Amarok]

Driving 1000+ and watching a 3 and a half minute video aren't even remotely the same thing.

Yes it is if both claims are equally absurd .

---

The Bible doesn't need self correcting because it isn't wrong, which is why I challenged any of you to debunk it scientifically and none of you could do it.

the bible does not need to be debunked . It's a pile of unsupported claims .

---

What are you talking about? What defines faith is fact that one DOESN'T KNOW. It's funny how you guys don't know until you get backed into a corner, you NEVER lead with it. It took 8 pages for someone to admit the 'don't know.

I never claim to know absolutely on provisionally on evidence . And you have back no one into anything fool . Thou i'm sure you deluded enough to think you have . As for the notion the bible does not need to self correct itself . Your right it simply develops new excuses to remain relevant. Science is a good method of improving and expanding a house . The bible is a imaginary invisible house that fits the imagineers imagining .

---

I haven't actually watched the video (because, you know, life is short with no after life), but whatever it may show I don't know how you can be so sure it isn't contrived.  You know advertisers on commercials put white coats on actors who play scientists, right?  I don't know why you buy the 'reporter' being legitimate.  Oh well, that's all the time I can make available for something this trivial.  Carry on.

You might also note the he has failed other times. Lost the support of the very media outlet that reported this. First accepted and then ran away from a controlled test which he himself helped design. And is widely regarded as a quack by other UFO quacks .

---

Few people read peer-reviewed journals. They're generally expensive, and frequently require quite a bit of education in the covered field just to understand the material. How many journals do you subscribe to? How frequently do you read more than an abstract - if even that? Do you actually get your science knowledge from popular sites and mass media?

I read a lot of journals and am suspect of pop media's coverage of science . But that is not remotely equal to blindly accepting the bible . So you can take the particular anti science shit that Scott Walker and his ilk plopped into your empty skull and screw off.