(December 31, 2017 at 10:38 am)Brian37 Wrote:(December 31, 2017 at 9:14 am)Huggy74 Wrote: There's one little problem with your theory, it's not falsifiable...
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Falsifiability
Addressed here in the afore mentioned thread here: https://atheistforums.org/thread-51134-p...pid1644447
Wolves Are Suffering Less From Inbreeding Than Expected
As you can see from the above article the AVERAGE wolf is the offspring of wolves who are brother and sister, which means there are wolves even more inbred than that.
So then the point is irrelevant since none of you has seen me make any such claim.
You are NOT getting it.
We get the same shit from EVERY damned religion in the world.
When the apologist cannot point to their book, they try to shit on science. When they cant do that, they try to claim to be the inventors of science.
Don't believe me?
FINE, be brave and do the following.
GOOGLE the following.
"Muslim science"
Then
"Jewish science"
Then
"Buddhist science"
Then
"Hindu science"
Every damned religion in the world has apologists whom crap on science or tries to claim ownership of science. NEITHER tactic works because scientific method is COMPLETELY independent of religion.
You realize you can't apply the scientific method to something that's unfalsifiable right?
