Ayost,
A perfect being is a complete being. It wants nothing. It needs nothing. It has no desires because to desire something entails missing something that would make it better, and it cannot be better. A perfect being wouldn't need to act because the only reason to act is to accomplish a goal but the perfect being can have no goals. A perfect being is perfectly fulfilled.
So when you say that God acted or intended or wanted in the same breath as saying God is perfect, you are contradicting yourself. Your concept is self-contradictory and therefore incoherent. It is statements like this that make atheists shake their heads. How can Christians expect atheists believe in something they can't even coherently describe?
A perfect being is a complete being. It wants nothing. It needs nothing. It has no desires because to desire something entails missing something that would make it better, and it cannot be better. A perfect being wouldn't need to act because the only reason to act is to accomplish a goal but the perfect being can have no goals. A perfect being is perfectly fulfilled.
So when you say that God acted or intended or wanted in the same breath as saying God is perfect, you are contradicting yourself. Your concept is self-contradictory and therefore incoherent. It is statements like this that make atheists shake their heads. How can Christians expect atheists believe in something they can't even coherently describe?