(March 17, 2018 at 1:04 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(March 17, 2018 at 12:28 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: Now your just blowing smoke...trying to cover up. Lol
I'm honestly curious, RR. In which part is the blowing of smoke occurring? The idea of angelology or the idea that Hawkins probably thought he had better thing to spend his time on?
I think that the rhetoric is the part that is blowing smoke. That Prof. Hawking was an atheist is an interesting anecdote. But much like the philosophers, it begs the question of why. If he doesn’t have some reason or evidence, but it is just opinion; then the question is why is it relevant. Now it seems that people are shying away, appearing to indicate that he may not have given it much thought. Which if it’s just an opinion, and a poorly formed one at that; does’nt help it much in the relevance factor.
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther