(March 17, 2018 at 1:17 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(March 17, 2018 at 1:04 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: I'm honestly curious, RR. In which part is the blowing of smoke occurring? The idea of angelology or the idea that Hawkins probably thought he had better thing to spend his time on?
I think that the rhetoric is the part that is blowing smoke. That Prof. Hawking was an atheist is an interesting anecdote. But much like the philosophers, it begs the question of why. If he doesn’t have some reason or evidence, but it is just opinion; then the question is why is it relevant. Now it seems that people are shying away, appearing to indicate that he may not have given it much thought. Which if it’s just an opinion, and a poorly formed one at that; does’nt help it much in the relevance factor.
Hawking studied the cosmos to a depth that you will likely never study anything in your life. He never managed to find any evidence for your gawd. Because of that, you want to denigrate one of the worlds foremost cosmologists because he didn't live up to your standards of philosophy? News flash, he wasn't a philosopher even if he waxed philosophical at times.
,
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.