(March 16, 2018 at 9:50 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: ...Like I said, philosophy wasn’t his strong suit. I find this to be fairly common, among those who publically scoff at philosophy. Quite the shock...I know! And if that is representive of his view of religion, then I would dare say he had a poor and naive grounding in that area as well.
Without a background in pastafarian theology how can you comment on the existence or otherwise of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?
This is getting excitingly close to 'you lack an understanding of sophisticated theology' but then I expect you're smart enough not to use that gambit.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.